MCS asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

拜託英文高手~該怎麼翻譯才好?

Companies like Wal-Mart, which apparently never progressed beyond using barcode at the item level for price lookup at Point of Sale (POS), thought that RFID would let them leapfrog the competition into full automation in the supply chain. As some of us predicted, they are finding that passive RFID is not significantly different from barcode, and the full benefits of automation are not possible. Companies like UPS, FedEx, Walgreens, Home Depot, and many others who make full use of barcode in the supply chain at distribution centers, warehouses, and store back rooms, now have the edge over RFID users. That is why RFID has stalled.

A lot has been written about RFID as the solution to the chaos that exists in the back room of large retail chain stores like Wal-Mart. For companies that have been using barcode-based Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), and Advanced Shipping Notices (ASN), Warehouse Management Systems (WMS), as well as Distribution Center Automatic Sortation Systems, the disorderly back room was never a problem. These concepts have been in use with barcode for more than 25 years. Another problem that RFID was to eliminate is the retail out of stock (OOS). Again, systems that have been using barcode generated POS data to drive the replenishment cycle have had this problem under control for years, and find the need for RFID Shelf Readers completely unnecessary.

The problem with RFID in the supply chain is largely due to the need for an inexpensive tag. This need can only be satisfied by demanding very high production runs. The only tag that can satisfy this need is the UHF passive tag.

The passive tag, with its large two dimensional antenna, does not perform much better than barcode. The antenna is highly directional which negates RFID's perceived advantage of not requiring "Line-of-Sight." While the tag can be read through some materials it fails to read through metals or liquids which can be found in large abundance in the supply chain.

Update:

請不要用翻譯軟體翻的直接貼上來~那樣翻出來的很不通暢

Update 2:

請英文高手幫幫忙>"<

3 Answers

Rating
  • Leo
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Best Answer

    像渥瑪這樣的公司, 顯然在銷售點從未嘗試使用條碼以外的系統查詢單價, 以為無線射頻辨識系統在供應鏈全自動化裡能夠大幅領先他們的競爭對手. 就如同我們一些人預測的, 他們發現被動式無線射頻辨識系統和條碼系統其實沒有明顯的差異, 而且自動化帶來的所有好處其實不可能實現. 像UPS, FedEx, Walgreens, Home Deport, 以及很多其它完全使用條碼系統在配售中心, 倉庫以及物流中心來管理供應鏈的公司, 現在反而比無線射頻辨識系統的用戶具有優勢. 這就是為甚麼無線射頻辨識系統的應用受挫.

    有很多文章報導有關無線射頻辨識系統可以解決像渥碼這樣大型連鎖公司物流中心存在的混亂情況. 對於長期使用條碼系統為基礎的電子數據交換系統, 出貨預告系統, 倉管系統, 以及配送中心自動化分類系統, 在雜亂無章的物流中心使用完全沒有問題. 這些觀念配合條碼系統已經使用超過25年了. 無線射頻辨識系統要去除的另一個問題是零售庫存售馨. 然而, 應用條碼系統自動產生訂單來控制供貨週期的做法已經將這個問題完全在控制之下行之有年, 所以覺得無線射頻辨識系統的架位讀取機完全沒有必要.

    無線射頻辨識系統在供應鏈的問題大多是在於需要有低價的標示牌配合使用. 這個需求只能在非常高的生產率之下才能實現. 唯一能滿足這個要求的標示牌只有UHF被動式標示牌.

    被動式標示牌, 加上它的大型天線; 其實功效沒有比條碼系統好到哪裡去. 由於天線具有高度方向性所以限制了無線射頻辨識系統不需要線性條碼的潛在優勢.雖然可以穿過某些材質讀取標示牌, 但是金屬和液體等等在供應鏈裡可以大量輕易看到的材質卻是無法穿透來讀取標示牌的資料.

    Oops....now I start getting the picture why the RFID application is stalled.

    2007-08-08 11:35:07 補充:

    I'll call it a day for now...can't spent too much time having fun with your documents; but I do learn something on the RFID through this translation word by word.

    2007-08-08 11:36:10 補充:

    If you think my work is o.k. for you and you would like to have me finish up the rest two papers, let me know. I'll get them done for you tomorrow!!

    Wish you had a real nice day!

  • 用翻譯軟體翻的直接貼上來根本也不順

    前三個字 Companies like Wal-Mart 是說公司如像渥爾馬特...

    而不是公司喜歡

  • 1 decade ago

    公司喜歡沃爾碼,在使用明顯未曾進步後備地址寄存碼在項目水平之外為價格查尋在賣點(POS),想法RFID在供應鏈將讓他們作蛙跳競爭入充分的自動化。 如同一些我們預言了,他們發現被動RFID不是顯著與後備地址寄存碼不同,并且自動化的充分的好處不是可能的。 公司喜歡UPS、聯邦快遞公司、Walgreens, Home Depot和充分利用後備地址寄存碼在供應鏈在分配中心的許多人,儲藏,并且商店房間,現在有邊緣在RFID用戶。 所以RFID失去了作用。

    很多被寫了關於RFID作為解答給存在於大零售連鎖商店後面屋子像沃爾碼的混亂。 為使用基於後備地址寄存碼的電子數據互換的公司(EDI)和先進的運輸的通知(ASN),倉庫管理系統(WMS),並且分配中心自動Sortation系統,雜亂後面屋子未曾是一個問題。 這些概念是在使用中與後備地址寄存碼超過25年。 另一個問題RFID是消滅零售脫銷(OOS)。 再次,使用後備地址寄存碼的引起的POS數據駕駛加注週期的系統有這個問題在控制之下多年來和發現對RFID架子讀者的需要完全地多餘。

    問題與RFID在供應鏈主要歸結於需要對於一個低廉標記。 這需要可能通過要求非常高生產運行只滿意。 可能滿足這需要的唯一的標記是UHF被動標記。

    被動標記,用它的大二維天線,不執行好比後備地址寄存碼。 否定不要求「視行的RFID的被察覺的好處的天線是高度定向的」。 當標記可以通過一些材料時讀它不通過在大豐盈在供應鏈可以被發現的金屬或液體讀。

    2007-08-06 16:20:41 補充:

    我是把整個網站翻譯,應該還順的。

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.