How come hijackers are alive? is 9/11 is inside job by Bush Admin?
10: Names do not appear on any passenger manifest??? - This is not easy to arrange my friends
9: None of them were subjected to any autopsy - There is none!???
8: 5 - 7 Have turned up alive and been interviewed by the BBC in the UK.
7: FBI has not revised its list.
6: Special Agent FLAGG said they found a list including the names of the hijackers and a manual; this gives a new meaning to the word, FALSE Flag.
5: It is silly to assume they (Hijackers) could've flown a plane.
4: No way, cell phones calls could’ve been made from that altitude and speed the plane was traveling at.
3: Tape recording was played allegedly from flight 93. This included the passengers discussing how they were going to break down the door using a drink cart.
If 9-11 is a inside job don't you think people like to know who is responsible?
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
Don't listen to these lame answers. They are all sheeple who are too scared to look at the truth. You are right. 12 of the 19 hijackers have been found safe & sound. They are very much alive and well.
As for this idiot above me named "Laissez - Faire Guy" here is an answer for him and people like him....
Question 1. How could the attacks be faked in such a massive operation? Surely one of the hundreds of people involved would step forward and declare what they know to the media? Right?
ANSWER: Three major elements in the operational security of the September 11 Black Op would not be guessed by the average citizen, this amounting to a fourth element.
First, most of the participants in the operation had no idea they were participating in it. Instead, they thought they were involved in a war game scheduled for that day (coincidence number 123). For example several fighter wings had been flown out of the area as part of the games, providing scant air cover in the event. Later, when 911 itself resulted in the call down of all commercial aircraft, this would have made it possible to land three of the hijacked flights in the confusion, while substitute aircraft took over. Thus, 911 acted as its own cover, in effect, as well.
Second, many of the key participants in the operation already belonged to intelligence agencies from one of the participating countries, principally (at a guess) the CIA, MI6, and Mossad. All three agencies are known to have black ops and Mossad, in particular, has a very long history in explosive ordnance disposal (EOD, as it is known in the trade. (This branch of special operations has little to do with “disposal” and much to do with “explosives.”) No intelligence officer is likely to blow the cover on an operation to which he/she is fully committed. Even if an intel type decided to tell all, he or she would be scheduled for immediate “extreme prejudice” treatment, not to mention the barrier he or she would face in the next paragraph. Embarrassingly
Third, as our own experience with the media suggests, stories that directly contradict the spin are unwelcome, to say the least, even from undercover agents. The extremely sensitive nature of the story would trigger a series of consultations up the chain of ownership to the top, from which a flat ““no”” would be issued. The mere possibility of Israel being involved in such a story would send owners into a panic. It is a matter of public record that all five principal owners are committed zionists for whom Israel can do no wrong.
Question 2. The mere possibility that the attacks were faked just sounds preposterous to me. Who could believe such a thing?
ANSWER: The true nature of 911 could be called “the secret that keeps itself.” It had predecessors in both American and middle eastern history in which the true perpetrators of “terrorist” acts had already been painted as victims, in effect, by the media. From the Gulf of Tonkin incident which triggered the Vietnam War back to the bombing of the King David Hotel in 1945 which enabled the creation of the the state of Israel, the attack of 911 is hardly an isolated example. Moreover, the Operation Northwoods plan (now public under the FOIA) called for hijackings of passenger aircraft, blowing up a US ship, and orchestrated terrorism in American cities - all to be blamed on Fidel Castro. Wikipedia’’s version is semi-close.
Question 3. What benefit would the perpetrators of the 911 attacks, the ones you claim are most probably behind them, get from such an operation?
ANSWER: In a nutshell, American and British Oil interests would benefit hugely from the resulting invasions of Afghanistan, namely in a pipeline corridor from the central Asian oil fields to the existing middle eastern pipeline network, including new terminal facilities at Haifa. The Iraqi oil fields are the main prize, however. They are likely to remain in American hands for the foreseeable future. The ultimate profits from such operations are enormous and swell the coffers of companies owned by the Bush (Carlyle Group and Zapata Oil) and Cheney (Halliburton) Families, not to mention Unocal and other oil giants. There would be additional benefits to the arms industry in the manufacture of arms and war materiel to accommodate the new conflict.
In addition, a global master plan for the conquest of the Middle East had already been worked out by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) drawn up by the neocon element in Washington. The plan even called for a “new Pearl Harbor” as the trigger that would set it in motion.
Finally, Israel would get a green light for a new wave of oppression in Gaza and the West Bank. World opinion would not turn against draconian new projects such as “The Wall,” if neighboring Islamic Countries (including Palestine) were viewed generally as a source of terrorism. There appears to be a long-term plan in effect, one that passes from government to government in Israel. The plan calls for a “divide and conquer” strategy by which all of Palestine will eventually become part of Israel.
Question 4. If the attacks of September 11 were faked, what about the long string of terrorist attacks and suicide bombings attributed to Al Qaeda?
ANSWER: Al Qaeda is almost certainly a long-term black operation that began shortly after the end of close cooperation between Ousama Bin Laden and the Mujahadeen with the United States in Afghanistan during the 1990s. Bin Laden, who is known to have suffered from terminal kidney disease, was visited by the CIA section chief in a hospital in Dubai in mid-2001. He survived just long enough after 911 to issue a statement that the attacks were not his work or the work of any Muslim. The denial appeared in a Pakistani newspaper, but was ignored by western news sources. In the words of one of a Panel member from the intel community, “Al Qaeda is us.”
In view of the fact that the same pattern of anomalous circumstances surrounds both previous and subsequent attacks attributed to Al Qaeda (see OTHER ATTACKS - this website), Al Qaeda appears to serve as a kind of universal boogeyman to herd frightened western legislators into a neo-fascist political program that will, in the long run, result in dictatorial powers concentrated in the hands of a small cadre in Washington.
Question 5. If you people are right, why aren’t you all dead by now?
ANSWER: If you’re asking why we haven’t been "taken care of" by the true perpetrators, the answer is twofold. a) There are far too many of us to be "taken care of" without raising more suspicion than the perpetrators could handle. There are now literally hundreds and thousands of 911-skeptical websites, thousands of people working on the issue, and millions of people who have reached the same degree of skepticism or suspicion. (b) We assume that the perpetrators have enough control/influence over the mainstream media to keep 911 issues off the page and off the screen. Thus, they may not be particularly worried about our efforts - so far.
If they are worried, they will launch (or already have launched) a disinformation campaign. This would consist of one or more elements in an internet setting of articles and websites: Limited Hangout (a partial analysis, along with blame placed on the military-industrial complex, for example); Well-poisoning (the appearance of an investigative effort accompanied by stories or ads that refer to UFOs, mental telepathy, or what have you); Blackballing (a mixture of name-calling and misdirected analysis that leaves the impression that legitimate websites are either run by "conspiracy nuts" or are themselves engaged in a disinformation campaign run by terrorists); Denial of Evidence (a specific piece of 9/11 evidence is analyzed with seeming care - but for the omission of one or two crucial elements. The analysis may conclude that a particular video or photo or document was faked, unreliable, or in some other way unacceptable as evidence.)
The fact that websites with some of these qualities already exist (not a large percentage) creates problems with interpretation; there would be no easy way to distinguish such a website mounted by a trained psyops professional from one designed by a well-meaning but off-track investigator.
Question 6. Are you saying the Jews are behind 911?
ANSWER: Certainly not. Although Israel is ostensibly a Jewish state, its actions in the middle east are in direct conflict with Jewish Law, ethics and morality. The European (Khazarite) Jews may be described as double victims, suffering not only from centuries of persecution after the fall of Muslim Spain, but from the deceptive practices adopted by the Zionist planners responsible for Israel. Myths such as “a land without people for a people without land” (both questionable propositions) misled thousands of settlers in the Jewish proto-state, followed by millions later.
As a general rule, zionist organizations in the west have only one tool with which to counter revelations of the myth-building exercise. Whoever makes such claims is labeled an “anti-semite,” a peculiarly ironic charge under the circumstances.
911 ATTACK ON AMERICA.COM
FREE PRESS INTERNATIONAL.COM
- mckenziecalhounLv 71 decade ago
Son, the fact that they don't show you, personally, or the general public, any classified or even sensitive information on the events around 911 is NOT proof of anything except that you haven't earned it.
Why would they share such information with people who would just find a way to turn it around into another conspiracy of a different sort!
They won't tell you, therefore, it must be a conspiracy?
10) You have not seen the passenger manifest. You saw what conspiracy theorists decided to show you.
9) No autopsy on bodes that were in tiny pieces? You expect bodies when planes are traveling at speeds they were not meant to travel at? That's like expecting pieces from the Pentagon crash after a plane hit it at full falling speed vs. the normal procedures that planes take to minimize damage in a crash. These people WANTED to crash the planes at top speeds! Not land softly and walk away! Autopsies?
8) Nonsense. If true they would be in court today. That's a lie. Prove it, and not with a conspiracy piece. A BBC piece will do.
7) Have you seen the FBI list or just the conspiracy groups list of the list? Proof is direct, not manipulated by those who have an agenda.
6) FLAGG? An anonymous "agent"? GODS! How many times is this tired excuse brought out! I used to hear about it for years when I still believed in U.F.O.s.
5) Silly that they could have flown a plane? How about putting a gun to the head of the pilot long enough to get into New York, then just aiming. Ask any pilot: flying is easy. It's landing that's a problem.
4) Son, cell phone signals aren't dependent on how fast you go. They travel much faster than a plane. That's silly.
They actually work better higher up due to proximity to the satellites. Mind you, the difference isn't much. This one is just silly.
3) Enough, if there was as much proof as you say, the courts would be full.
Proof this is all nonsense:
1) not one court case.
2) not one nation calling for an investigation except Islamic nations (though I think only one has had the audacity to even mention it).
3) Constant and continuous mention of it on the web for YEARS with no action, no change.
4) Look at the reasoning used above!
5) Look at how many people agreed with the poster and then check THEIR questions.
You'll see why people walk the other way when you check the profiles of the people who agree with the question poster.
Enough of this. It's getting silly.
- Uncle PennybagsLv 71 decade ago
I want you to think about all the people that need to be involved in the conspiracy if 9/11 was an inside job. You've implied quite a few here. Now add the planners, demolitions guys, people who planted evidence, the missile guys from the Pentagon, people who prevented an effective air defense, etc.
You wind up with a conspiracy consisted of hundreds of people who are involved. Don't you think it odd that not ONE person in the conspiracy blew the whistle ahead of time, or repented after the fact and confessed, or even got drunk one day and bragged about how they murdered 3,000+ americans?
Don't you think someone would have noticed a cruise missile missing that was flown into the Pentagon? Don you think all the eye witnesses that saw a plane hit the Pentagon couldn't tell a passenger airliner from a cruise missile at low altitude?
I'm sorry, conspiracies that large just don't stay secret for so long. Ever hear the saying "3 people can keep a secret, but only if 2 of them are dead?"
- SkepticLv 71 decade ago
You've raised some excellent questions that are already discussed on the web. Unfortunately, no one on this forum seems to have challenged the facts you present them with any credible arguments.
I don't know if it was a inside job, but I do know that the twin towers and the WTC 7 building (3 buildings) were planned demonlitions. Buildings don't pulverize and fall into their own foot print. The 9/11 Commision report is incomplete and inaccurate.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- dez604Lv 51 decade ago
Dude stop disrespecting the lives lost on Sept 11, your a joke the conspricey theories are a joke, stop hating your country, what are you gonna ask next was Peral Harbor set up by truman? Then I guess Clinton set up the following events 2 right???
Does Osama and the Boys want us out of Iraq so they can have a safe Haven for operations? Yes, If we are defeated does that impower Osama and there Radical cause? Yes. If we are defeated will they continue to attack U.S. Interest's worldwide probably more so. How can I say that, Heck, I am former Military what do I know right? but I am sure that Osama and the boys Attepted to blow up the world Center in 93, I do know They Killed 19 Airman and wounded 300 Airman in 96 at Khobar Towers, I do know, That Osama and the Boys Blew up 2 U.S. Embassy's in Africa in 98, I do know that Osama and the boys Blow a Hole in the U.S..S Cole in 2000. I do know that 3,000 Americans were killed by Osama and the Boys on 9-11, and stop your stupid Left wing nut 9-11 conspricy Theories to, respect our Country and lives lost that day . So If we leave and they win, and they gain strengh and more followers, there gonna come fast and hard against us, so live in your left wing nut world where everything is America's Fault, someday you may realize one morning were fighting these Terrorists for our WAY OF LIFE at least Bush is doing something about it!!!!!!! Heck CLINTON did nothing about it, expect LIE ABOUT HAVING AN AFFAIR WITH A GIRL IN WOULDN'T HAVE TOUCHED IN HIGH SCHOOL, and spent more time worrying about LYING ABOUT scandals like Whitewater THAN MAYBE he would have taken Bin Laden into custody in 98 when the Sudan was willing to hand him over. Also Iran, Iraq, Syria, the Fillipinnes to name a few have been state Sponsers of terrorism for decades, to include training Facilities, so we didn't bring Osama and the boys to the IRaq, they were already there waitingSource(s): common sense and someone who is not a left wing nut
- B.KevorkianLv 71 decade ago
None of the Hijackers are alive. People with similar names, or who had thier identities 'stolen' by the Hijackers are still alive. The Hijackers blew up with the planes.
- ♥ MelLv 71 decade ago
I think I wont even start to answer this question. There are too many. I think you are throwing out a bait.And this question blames President Bush of Murder in 9/11
- msi_cordLv 71 decade ago
I would suggest you read the 9/11 commission's report and actually look into what happened instead of relying on sites of questionable integrity. You will see that the truth is pretty obvious and simple.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
They're not alive.
Last question like this that I answer. Ron Paul, is being royally screwed because of his followers. I hope that you realize that.
- TRAFLv 41 decade ago
Ah c'mon Rosie, give it up.
- T DLv 51 decade ago
Yeah, and the government can read your thoughts unless you keep your tin foil hat on.