After reading through some of the answers, I am somewhat surprised that Michael is viewed by some as a true journalist. I have never attacked the messenger as implied in some of the answers - it is his one-sided, obviously biased op-eds that I criticize.
Michael is very good at what he does, however, making documentaries is not what he does. As far as proof of this, ask yourself why, in his glowing report of the medical care in Cuba, he failed to mention that when Fidel was ill, they imported a doctor from Spain to care for him, or why there is such a large Cuban population in the south east, or why the Cubans keep coming to our shores in just about anything that floats.
Remember, a true documentary presents ALL of the facts and BOTH sides of an issue - not just the writer's bias and opinion.