Informed Concent and Medical Malpractice suit?

If you sign an Informed Concent form before a procedure was done that resulted in injury how does that affect the Medical Malpractice suit, or does it?


If a patient sues for malpractice (claiming that they didn't know about the risks involved) but signed an informed concent form, does it have an affect on the trial?

3 Answers

  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    It depends on what reason the medical malpractice suit was filed. Gross negligence can sometimes override an informed consent. Please give more details if possible.

    NOTE: photochick, please email me for more details. :)

    • Login to reply the answers
  • ?
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    If your injury was a result of one of the risks of your procedure explained under the informed consent you signed, it is very unlikely you will win in a malpractice suit. However, negligence on the part of the doctor is a different cookie, but there you have the burden of proof.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 3 years ago

    it extremely is in basic terms what the coverage firms say. Malpractice makes up 2% of scientific expenses [a million]. whether you have been able to bypass rules that decrease those expenses in a million/2, we could save a whopping a million%, it extremely is assuming each dime of that mark downs is surpassed onto the buyer. In replace for those mark downs, juries are capping of their potential to award people who've been harmed. it extremely is very advantageous once you're a pharmaceutical enterprise that places out a drug that hurts some million human beings or spill some billion barrels of oil interior the sea. seem, my spouse is a private-prepare heart professional. We pay out the *** for malpractice coverage. It sucks. $25,000/year sucks. i could plenty extremely purchase a advantageous boat with that money, yet while it is between paying 25k and having the guy you injury being suitable compensated and paying 20k according to year and not protecting all their expenses, the final element to do is obtrusive. It hurts sufferers, does not save any money for them and makes no distinction to physicians. the only ones who win are the coverage firms and companies that don't decide to be held responsible for their movements.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.