Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

承羲 asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago


I stress the value of the words at this juncture because so much work that is of an overtly symbolic or expressive kind is nowadays more often than not referred to as "organic" as sculptural and individualistic.There are certain similarities in the current usage of the word organic and in the original uses of the term expressionist in the twenties that best describes an architecture with spiritual overtones and characteristics, although it cannot be said that there is either an organic an "expressionist" style as such.Both impulses really lack cohesion.Yet beyond that debate which inherently arises over their definition, the terms have proved useful in recent architectural discussions.


2 Answers

  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    我在這個時候強調詞的價值因為那麼多的工作, 因為具有公然符號或者表達的種類現下比更為經常沒作為" 有組織" 提到作為雕刻和個人主義。 在詞有組織的目前用法中和在術語 表現主義的 的原始使用中在二十年代有某些相似之處最好描述具有精神上泛音和特性的一個架構, 雖然它不能說這樣有任一個有組織的。 兩個動力確實都缺少內聚力。 還在固有地在他們的定義上起來的那辯論那邊, 術語在最近架構討論中證實有用。



    Source(s): me
  • 1 decade ago

    我在這一個接合強調字的價值因為如此很多的工作哪一是有顯明象徵或者表達類型的是現在比較時常超過不提及像雕刻而個人主義的一樣 " 有機的 "。有字的現在用法的特定的類似有機的而且在最好用精神上的弦外之音和特性描述建築的二十幾歲的期限表現派的人的最初使用中,雖然它不能夠被說也有一有機的一”expre

    Source(s): 電腦
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.