Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 1 decade ago

Do Conspiracy Theorists have peer-reviewed technical papers that support their controlled demolition fantasy?

Peer reviewed papers and articles on how the towers collapsed..

Engineers Explain WTC Collapse

http://www.architectureweek.com/2002/0529/news_3-1...

Report Ties WTC Collapses to Column Failures

http://enr.construction.com/news/buildings/archive...

IT WAS THE FIRE, CAUSED THE TWIN TOWER COLLAPSE - icivilengineer.com

http://www.icivilengineer.com/News/WTC/Fire.html

Simulation for the collapse of WTC after aeroplane impact - Lu XZ., Yang N., Jiang JJ. Structure Engineer, 66(sup.). 2003, 18-22

Bazant, Z.P., & Zhou, Y.

"Addendum to 'Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? - Simple Analysis" (pdf)

Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 3, (2002): 369-370.

Brannigan, F.L.

"WTC: Lightweight Steel and High-Rise Buildings"

Fire Engineering v.155, no. 4, (2002): 145-150.

Clifton, Charles G.

Elaboration on Aspects of the Postulated Collapse of the World Trade Centre Twin Towers

HERA: Innovation in Metals. 2001. 13 December 2001.

"Construction and Collapse Factors"

Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002): 106-108.

Corbett, G.P.

"Learning and Applying the Lessons of the WTC Disaster"

Fire Engineering v.155, no. 10, (2002.): 133-135.

"Dissecting the Collapses"

Civil Engineering ASCE v. 72, no. 5, (2002): 36-46.

Eagar, T.W., & Musso, C.

"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation"

JOM v. 53, no. 12, (2001): 8-12.

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Therese McAllister, report editor.

World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations

(also available on-line)

Gabrielson, T.B., Poese, M.E., & Atchley, A.A.

"Acoustic and Vibration Background Noise in the Collapsed Structure of the World Trade Center"

The Journal of Acoustical Society of America v. 113, no. 1, (2003): 45-48.

Glover, N.J.

"Collapse Lessons"

Fire Engineering v. 155, no. 10, (2002): 97-103

Marechaux, T.G.

"TMS Hot Topic Symposium Examines WTC Collapse and Building Engineering"

JOM, v. 54, no. 4, (2002): 13-17.

Monahan, B.

"World Trade Center Collapse-Civil Engineering Considerations"

Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction v. 7, no. 3, (2002): 134-135.

Newland, D.E., & Cebon, D.

"Could the World Trade Center Have Been Modified to Prevent Its Collapse?"

Journal of Engineering Mechanics v. 128, no. 7, (2002):795-800.

National Instititue of Stamdards and Technology: Congressional and Legislative Affairs

“Learning from 9/11: Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center”

Statement of Dr. Arden L. Bement, Jr., before Committee of Science House of Representatives, United States Congress on March 6, 2002.

Pinsker, Lisa, M.

"Applying Geology at the World Trade Center Site"

Geotimes v. 46, no. 11, (2001).

The print copy has 3-D images.

Public Broadcasting Station (PBS)

Why the Towers Fell: A Companion Website to the Television Documentary.

NOVA (Science Programming On Air and Online)

Post, N.M.

"No Code Changes Recommended in World Trade Center Report"

ENR v. 248, no. 14, (2002): 14.

Post, N.M.

"Study Absolves Twin Tower Trusses, Fireproofing"

ENR v. 249, no. 19, (2002): 12-14.

The University of Sydney, Department of Civil Engineering

World Trade Center - Some Engineering Aspects

A resource site.

"WTC Engineers Credit Design in Saving Thousands of Lives"

ENR v. 247, no. 16, (2001): 12.

The Towers Lost and Beyond

http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Eduardo Kausel, John E. Fernandez, Tomasz Wierzbicki, Liang Xue, Meg Hendry-Brogan, Ahmed F. Ghoniem, Oral Buyukozturk, Franz-Josef Ulm, Yossi Sheffi

Update:

Paul I: As I responded to your email. peer-reviewed doesn't mean reviewed by other 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists! It means reviewed by objective engineers and scientists that effectively sign off on your work. Provide a source that is a mainstream, peer-reviewed journal and I will happily concede the point.

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Conspiracy theorists don't deal well with facts. Their heads might implode. LOL.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    4 years ago

    The problem with conspiracy stories is that they get a life of their own. Rumor becomes truth, speculation becomes proof. 9/11 was such a terrible event for us that some justification, no matter how bizarre, rises to make some sense of the horror. Many folks become fixated on it - from Jews not showing up for work to the President having a hand in it. I guess it will never end - November 22, 1963 still has conspiracy swirling around it. And the farther we get from the event, the more these conspiracies grow. More than 70% of Americans think Kennedy was killed in some mafia/CIA hit. Me, I think 19 Islamic nuts flew those planes into the WTC, the Penatgon and a lonely field in Pennsylvania. And Oswald shot Kennedy.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • ?
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    It was clearly NOT a controlled demolition - there is no evidence that demolition experts gutted out the buildings, pre-cut building members, planted explosives and then set off the charges (like what happened in the recent implosion of the building in vegas - read how long it took them to setup this building)

    Dallas Contracting Co., Inc. is a demolition company offering demolition contractor services. Visit website for more info

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount....

    http://www.nysun.com/article/48926

    1st one was edited my first week here it is Clinton Body Count

    as the next JFK thought I would share.

    WELCOME to the political arena. It's election season and if u think Cheney made a mistake in firing make no mistake here. The HillBill machine is coming right up your doorstep.

    Funny how these theories re-appear? It's Politics as usual Clinton style.

    I bow to your mastery and brilliance. Keep on Writing!!!

    Source(s): I am a former International Flight Service Manager/Instructor for Continental Airlines airplane security was my job/my life depended on it 911 was long ago planned airplanes are bombs the rest is all nonsense and sadness as far as I am concerned
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    If it was heat that brought the buildings down, they wouldn't have imploded. All four sides, with all the beams encased, couldn't have faulted to the point that it would come down evenly. If heat was the case, then the building would have fallen at the side of point entry. You, wanting to believe that airplanes were able to fly off course for over 45 minutes without being stopped is an issue you should tend to.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Another excellent post!! This may be your best yet. Allow me to commend you on your efforts. Thank you.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Paul I
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    yeah here you go.

    http://www.journalof911studies.com/

    lots of info there.I can email more if you like

    How is your calculus.anyway?You might just need it here if you choose to contact these people whose names can be found on this link

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Nice! Job job!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    You Tube. Thats all they need and the cartoon channel

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    We all saw the planes, didn't you?

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.