i am writing a political controversy paper and i need help with picking a topic HERE ARE THE 2 TOPICS.
1. i want to argue that the united states should stop supporting israel..by providing them with weapons ex when they attacked lebanon in july.... the 2nd topic i thought about was...
2. since 9/11 muslims have been mistreated and viewed as terrorists i want to argue that THIS MISTREATMENT needs to
which topic do u think i should write about .. which one seems more interesting.. would i have enough arguments to write an 8 pg paper with either topic.. should i change a couple words or add words... tell me what u think about both topics and arguments and counterarguments i could include
- Joe_PardyLv 51 decade agoFavorite Answer
If you really would like a controversial paper, you might start with the premise that 9/11 was an inside job. You could show this to be a fact by pointing out a lot of circumstantial evidence and then finishing with some concrete evidence. Few people know that the jet engine(s) found at the Pentagon crash site have been Identified as Pratt & Whitney JT8D's; an engine too small to be used on a Boeing 757, but just right for a smaller military aircraft.
Then comes the good part, you could make your paper into an investigatory paper. One that tries to determine why our country may have found it neccassary to go to these lenths to start these wars in the Middle East.
I promise you it will not be boring, because I have spend several months trying to understand this very topic. I have not come up with a clear answer, but what I have come up with is a whole different understanding of how things work in America and across the globe.
Here is a start for a paper. It shows our government was deeply envolved in the 9/11 attack: The true master minds. If you need help, with some of the rest of the paper, feel free to ask. You should have enough material here to write a book.
Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
Here are some video clips showing a trail of explosive squibs just before the destruction wave.
Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch.
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), started planning the invasion of Iraq, even before Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
- 3 years ago
Ask why construction 7 collapsed whilst no plane hit it, the reason being explosives, in case you have no longer have been given plenty preparation visit architects and engineers for 9/11 reality, and you gets a lot of preparation to help the mysterious give way that wasn't suggested in the respected 9/11 value. i'm specific it would be debatable yet once you're to ask a question approximately it that ought to be the 1st place to commence because of the fact its the main important.
- cantcuLv 71 decade ago
You aren't writing a 9/11 paper at all!
Why should we stop supporting them?
Lebanon was a staging point for Hezbollah, a terrorist group. to attack Israel. The same people who killed 424 of our Marines there in a Barracks bomb blast!
Israel has a right to defend herself and the attack was in response to the murders of several military inside Israel by Hezbollah and the kidnapping of 2 others who are presumed dead!
Isn't this the exact same argument, though we can't prove it, that the US is using against Iran?
You can write your own paper! You don't benefit from someone else doing it for you! Try and use your brain!
- Anonymous1 decade ago
i feel that topic number one has more facts and would be easier to write. However, number two seems much more interesting and i would rather read a paper about that
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- SouthernGritsLv 51 decade ago
I'm guessing your professor/teacher is liberal? He/she will love either topic. Knock yourself out.
Anytime you can blame the U.S. for anything, it's a good class topic. Ditto for the "mistreated".
- Kevin ALv 61 decade ago
"political controversy paper"
Well, make sure you lie a lot. It's the only way to make it truly political.
- Go BlueLv 61 decade ago
2's a lot easier
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Neither - how about factual truth?
Both of these topics are based on liberal propaganda and not based in fact.
Check this publication out; [not related to any government or government agency.]
- 1 decade ago
i think u should rite about supporting israel because they killed thousands & thousands of people and i think we should STOP surrpoting them it would make a very good story