Help Pls SupremeCtDcsn-1990sneed title details-anyto do with suing individual police not city?
need more help - i forgot to keep newspaper concerning this - got some help but need a little more -there was a 1990s dcsn by U S Supreme Ct on suing individual police for there actions need title date details??please
- MenifeeManiacLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Great case. Mr. Bivens was In Pro Per, and handwrote his appeal to the Supreme Court.
HARTMAN, ET AL. V. MOORE, JR., 388 F.3d 871 (D.C. Cir. 2004)
Has been granted cert in 2005;
Addresses the issue: Whether law enforcement agents may be liable under Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971), for retaliatory prosecution in violation of the First Amendment
when the prosecution was supported by probable cause.Source(s): http://www.defraudingamerica.com/bivens.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bivens_v._Six_Unknown... http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/immunity/bivens.h... http://plsc.uark.edu/plsc4193/hartman.pdf