? asked in 社會及文化語言 · 1 decade ago

請大家幫幫手呀....幫幫我翻譯

此圖的最佳回報位置就是越偏向左上角越好(高回報、低風險)。相反,投資者應避免選購一些位於右下角的基金,如基金C,此位置的基金不但風險較高而且回報率亦不理想,奉勸投資者對該類基金敬而遠之。

風險度的高低亦可反映投資產品(基金/股票或其他)的穩定性或升跌波幅,就以債券基金和科技基金來分別比喻基金A和基金B。

債券基金(基金A) 的作風及投資目標向來以穩健見證,收入來源穩定。該類基金以買入一些政府及大規模公司的債券為多,故此風險不高,正因其升跌波幅不大,故此從(圖3)來看,其表現亦穩步上揚,起跌不大。

至於科技基金(基金B),眾所周知,該行業於99年 3 月前可以用炙手可熱,當時 得令來形容,但當99年3月經濟泡沫爆破後,各科技股股價急速轉下,再加上大 多數科技基金皆有購買一些較小規模而又有潛質的科技公司,可惜當中大多欠債累累甚至倒閉,跌勢慘烈,正因情況如此逆轉,正好解釋何以基金B的走勢如此反覆及 大起大落。

3 Answers

Rating
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    The best repay position of this diagram is to incline toward more left up the corn is more good.(high repay, low risk)Contrary, the investor should avoid making choice of purchase some be located right descend a horny fund, as the fund C, the fund of this position not only the risk is higher and the repay rate also ignore to think, receiving to advise investor to the type's fund respect and far of.

    The risk degree of high and low can also reflect the stability of the investment product(fund/stock or other) or rise to fall a, distinguish the parable fund AN and fund B with the bond fund and science and technology fund.

    The style and the investment target of the bond fund(the fund A) have always been with the steady witness, the income source stabilizes.The type's fund with buying the bond of some governments and large-scale company is many, the for this reason risk isn't high, positive because it rises to don't greatly fall a, for this reason from(figure 3) see, it performance also steady go up, rise don't greatly fall.

    As for science and technology fund(the fund B), as everyone knows, that industry can use before March in 99 years haughtiness of the very influential and, had to make to describe at that time, but when 99 years March the economic foam blow up after, each science and technology stock price is rapid to turn bottom, and greatly most science and technology funds all have already purchased some more small scale and again have the science and technology company of the Qian quality, unfortunately in the middle mostly own money to even close down again and again, fall certainly horrifying, positive such being the case converse, at the right moment explain why the trend of the fund B thus repeatedly and fluctuate.

    2007-01-29 14:54:30 補充:

    この図の一番いい位置を報いるもっと左の上の角を傾くのがもっと良い。 (高さは報いる、低いリスク )相反する、投資者は避けるべきだ##て右て次の角に位置するいくつかの基金を選んで購入する、ばかりでなくリスクは信仰するが投資者を勧めることをわりに高くて、しかも歩合を報いても無視して思うことを位置の基金を基金の C 、このを及ぶに対して類基金の敬そして遠いの。リスクの度の高低も反映して製品 (基金 /株あるいはほか ) を投資することが出来るの安定性あるいは升は幅をウエーブ転ぶ、債券の基金と科技の基金で別々に基金の A と基金の B を喩える。

    2007-01-29 14:54:49 補充:

    債券の基金 (基金の A) のスタイルは投資の目標と今まで穏健の証明で、収入の供給源の安定。類は基金は多にいくつかの政府及び大規模な会社を入る債券を買う、だからリスクは高くない、まさにからそのあまり幅をウエーブ転ぶ、だからから (図 3) 見る、その表現も着々と上昇する、立ってあまり転ぶ。

    2007-01-29 14:55:03 補充:

    科技の基金 (基金の B) 、眾について所周知、業種いい 99年3月前に使うのが飛ぶ鳥も落とす、当時させなければならない形容するが、経済の泡は 99年3月に爆破した後、各科技の株の株価は急速に転じる、再び加えるのが大きくて多数科技の基金はすべてあって買う少しわりに小規模はそして質が潛がまたあるの科技会社、惜しい中にほとんど借金するのが数えきれないさえ倒産する、勢が転ぶのが悲惨だ、まさにから状況がこのように逆転する、ちょうど解釈するどうして基金のB の勢を歩いてこのように繰り返して、大きく変動する。

    2007-01-29 14:55:49 補充:

    此图的最佳回报位置就是越偏向左上角越好(高回报、低风险)。相反,投资者应避免选购一些位于右下角的基金,如基金C,此位置的基金不但风险较高而且回报率亦不理想,奉劝投资者对该类基金敬而远之。风险度的高低亦可反映投资产品(基金/股票或其他)的稳定性或升跌波幅,就以债券基金和科技基金来分别比喻基金A和基金B。

    2007-01-29 14:56:04 補充:

    债券基金(基金A) 的作风及投资目标向来以稳健见证,收入来源稳定。该类基金以买入一些政府及大规模公司的债券为多,故此风险不高,正因其升跌波幅不大,故此从(图3)来看,其表现亦稳步上扬,起跌不大。至于科技基金(基金B),众所周知,该行业于99年 3 月前可以用炙手可热,当时 得令来形容,但当99年3月经济泡沫爆破后,各科技股股价急速转下,再加上大 多数科技基金皆有购买一些较小规模而又有潜质的科技公司,可惜当中大多欠债累累甚至倒闭,跌势惨烈,正因情况如此逆转,正好解释何以基金B的走势如此反复及 大起大落。

  • Eric
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    We group those funds with optimal performance in the rate of return(ie. high return and low risk) under the upper left portion of this chart, the further to the upper left the better. On the contrary, investors should avoid choosing the funds at the lower right portion, such as Fund C. These funds are characterised by their relatively high risk level and a lower rate of return. Investors had better stay away from them.

    The stability and volatility of certain investment vehicles, such as mutual funds/equities or others, can be reflected on their inherent risk levels. I'm going further on this by putting the bond funds and the technology funds as Fund A and Fund B respectively.

    The approach and objective of bond funds( Fund A) focus on safety and soundness aiming at securing stable income. Such funds tend to acquire bonds issued by governments and large corporations with minimal risk and volatility. At the same time , they only inch their way up with very slight variations as shown in Fig. 3.

    Speaking of the technology funds (Fund B), we're well aware that this sector used to be a hot favourite until March 1999 when the global economic slump set in and triggered sharp falls of technology stocks across the board. Given their heavy holdings of small scale IT companies most of which were in the red or even on the verge of bankcruptcy, the majority of technology funds suffered a huge loss. This adverse change is to blame for the fluctuations and volatility in the performance of Funds B .

  • 1 decade ago

    holy sh it...that's some of the worst translation I've ever seen! Which website or software did you use to translate those paragraph?

    2007-02-09 11:50:57 補充:

    worst i've ever seen

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.