promotion image of download ymail app
Promoted

9/11: Did a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon ?

There is strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU

Youtube thumbnail

&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.

http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.

http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.

http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm

http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.

http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.

http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N...

25 Answers

Relevance
  • dstr
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Fred Burks – Former State Department Interpreter for Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, Vice Presidents Dick Cheney and Al Gore, Secretaries of State Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright. 18-year State Department career.

    Essay: "How is it possible that our military's highly touted missile detections systems could not locate Flight 77 in the 42 minutes it was known to be lost before it crashed into the heart of the defense system of the U.S.? …

    An even bigger question is why isn't our media asking these questions? Why isn't our military spending many millions of dollars to find out why military defense systems failed on 9/11? Why is it that the 9/11 commission budget was far less than the budget allotted to the Challenger Disaster or even the Monika Lewinsky affair?"http://www.wanttoknow.info/911star

    Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11. http://www.911truth.org

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    You call that a conspiracy theory?!

    This beats yours hands down! And, who knows? Maybe both are true. Then again, maybe Nancy Pelosi has a wiener.

    Did you know that many of the elite in Hollywood and the L.A. area began planning a 'turn the tables' crime during the Rodney King riots? Word on the street was that the black community of L.A. (as evidenced by the beating of Reginald Denny) would feel vindicated by an equal or greater crime by an African American against at least one caucasian.

    The planners needed a winning plot (the very stuff of Hollywood), a perfect cast of characters, a 'grip'm-to-the-tube' element (best would be a chase scene) and, of course lots and lots of compensation.

    Rumor has it that they had their cast and plot and then bought up advertising futures for 'DAY-TIME TV' spots 'knowing' there'd be a huge surge in average profits. They also bought futures in products commonly advertised on daytime TV.

    But the cast needed judges, juries, attorneys and others who were NOT caucasians. No problem. The victim (victimS) should be at least ONE white (the 'lead') and one other. Who should play the judge? Not white! Maybe Latino? No. African Americans despise Mexicans. Jewish? No impact. Well, in 1992, the Japanese 'car-invasion' was still making waves in the press. So? Get a Japanese judge.

    I guess the rest is history.

    The chase scene endangered not ONE SINGLE life since it was history's first low speed chase scene.

    But if hurting anyone was a concern, what about the victims? Did anyone read just few months ago about the two girls in a wreck in the NE? The coroner, a popular ex-mayor & physician mis-ID'd the girls, telling the family of the living girl that their daughter had died and the family of the dead girl to stay with their comatose "daughter".

    Even the best of the best can make mistakes. So the victims may well have been persons other than those claimed, correctly id'd but brought from a wreck or other cause of death, or neither. Just some nameless stiffs from the L.A. morgue!

    Beautiful! Remember how perfectly the plan worked? When the verdict was read and elation erupted out of control from one demographic while shock and horror flattened all from the other?

    BEAUTIFUL WORK, HOLLYWOOD!!!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Lucy
    Lv 4
    4 years ago

    No, it is not. Picking some out at random: "Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid". Probably true, but then I don't think anyone is saying it was the jet fuel that melted the steel. There was plenty of other combustible material in those buildings. Coal on its own does not burn hot enough to make steel yet you can make steel using a coal-fired furnace, you just have to enclose it and give it a good supply of air. "A chemical analysis... yielded an explosive, called Thermite" Research your chemistry. Thermite is iron oxide and aluminium, two materials that you are very likely to find in a skyscraper. Thermite burns slowly. The towers were supposed to have been brought down by a series of explosions timed to the millisecond. Not possible with thermite. "The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), started planning the invasion of Iraq, even before Pres. Bush took office." Probably true. They desperately wanted a reason to invade. 9/11 was a good enough excuse. That doesn't mean they did it. If they did, as the answerer above pointed out, why not implicate Iraq in the attack? "The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend" A whole weekend - yes, that would be enough to wire up 3 huge buildings for demolition. (<<< sarcasm) "One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757" So, the dozens of eye-witnesses who saw a civilian airliner fly into the Pentagon, many from very close by - they are all wrong, are they? The less wacko members of the conspiracy community now accept that it was a 757, and they claim that the missile / drone stories were actually invented by the government to make conspiracy theorists look ridiculous (as if they needed any help with that). When faced with these claims, ask yourself some questions: Is that evidence genuine? Is there a more rational explanation? Are they telling me the whole story? What was the supposed motive? If it was an inside job, why would they do it like that? How many people would have to be in on it and why have none of them come forward? Subjected to these questions all the conspiracy evidence falls apart. All of it.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    There can be no doubt that planes did hit the world trade towers but what did hit the Pentagon, and why, is still unanswered and I challenge anyone to come forth with a video that actually and visibly shows a plane hitting the Pentagon. Furthermore why was NORAD told to stand down? Building 7 was never touched by a plane it just had a few fires that were under control, why did building 7 collapse?, maybe it was because building seven was the central command center for what was going on. For all whom read this do a search on go ogle for the North-wood documents that were declassified concerning government sponsored terror, read it, understand it! Your government is lying to you in the name of there globalist agenda.

    Source(s): www.freedomtofacism.com, www.infowars.com., www.prisonplanet.tv, www.911truth.org, MSNBC news/911coverup
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • TCSO
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    You're too smart for us, guy. Why so many of you idiots think that an impact from a massive airliner with a huge ball of fire is going to leave holes shaped just like an airplane is STUPID. If only your brain could be used to find evidence of things that actually did happen. Also, our government has a very hard time keeping secrets about almost anything, and we have lots of whistle blowers. Don't you think that someone would have come forward by now to admit knowledge of something similar to what you describe? If you tell me they were all killed, you really are ignorant.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    No. A colleague who works in my office was commuting in and saw the plane physically strike the Pentagon. This person knows planes, has a job that requires this person to know a lot about planes, and would have recognized an A-3, a cruise missile, or whatever theory they're throwing around now. So if people are spouting this nonsense, they are calling my colleague a liar. I guess this person must be in on the conspiracy too? What a bunch of dorks to believe this crap.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Hello,

    I found some video footage of a plane "hitting" the pentagon.

    Does this look like a plane or a missle?

    To me, I see no plane.

    Our eyes are being deceived people. Wake up and smell the lies of our government. If you wake up, it just might save your life!

    Hope this helps you................ : - O

    Source(s): 1. MSNBC: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/128 2. CNN Video and I do not SEE any PLANE: http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/ 18225/ 3. Google Video from Judical Watch: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-565819848...
    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    As they say...there's none so blind as those who refuse to see.

    Yes..you are so right. I have researched 9-11 since that day. I believe the truth is finally going to come out.

    Keep up the good work!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Why don't you read the rebuttal on the one of the sites you quoted yourself, smart alec?

    http://www.rense.com/general70/jt.htm

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No - the planes that hit the WTC and the Pentagon are all on film, and are well documented. The victims that were on them also confirmed which planes hit where by the GPS tracking of their cell phones.

    None of the planes are an A-3 Skywarrior.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.