In 1919, British general ordered killing of 800 innocent civilians in india. Compare it with Saddams act?
Dyre was glorfied with prize money and honors. Now, the same country supported and bught saddam to justice for killing 143 shites. Why different yard stick..........
- SHIH TZU SAYSLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
There was no CNN or FoX news then and white people were reigning supreme in all the world then too.
Now the same white people (with such a tarnished history) are championing human rights? hahahahahaaaaaaa
- snashrafLv 51 decade ago
In Saddam case group conspired to kill Head of State. The case was dealt with according to prevailing system of justice there. Opening of fire on unarmed civilian was more serious offense. As no justice was done, agitated person has to take law in his own hand and punish the murderer.
All these sad events are part of past history. Peace and understanding are the need of day. Let us think of future. Pray for peace in Iraq.
- 1 decade ago
Once more it shows that might is right .
And remember General Dwyer ordered all escape routs closed for the civilian attending a political rally and mercilessly gunned down innocent people attending a peaceful rally .
- Anonymous1 decade ago
same thing. hang him.