promotion image of download ymail app

In 1919, British general ordered killing of 800 innocent civilians in india. Compare it with Saddams act?

Dyre was glorfied with prize money and honors. Now, the same country supported and bught saddam to justice for killing 143 shites. Why different yard stick..........

4 Answers

  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    There was no CNN or FoX news then and white people were reigning supreme in all the world then too.

    Now the same white people (with such a tarnished history) are championing human rights? hahahahahaaaaaaa

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    In Saddam case group conspired to kill Head of State. The case was dealt with according to prevailing system of justice there. Opening of fire on unarmed civilian was more serious offense. As no justice was done, agitated person has to take law in his own hand and punish the murderer.

    All these sad events are part of past history. Peace and understanding are the need of day. Let us think of future. Pray for peace in Iraq.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Once more it shows that might is right .

    And remember General Dwyer ordered all escape routs closed for the civilian attending a political rally and mercilessly gunned down innocent people attending a peaceful rally .

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    same thing. hang him.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.