US toll in Iraq hits 3,000.Ppl say more people have died at Bvsh's hand than Hussein. Really freedom-ur view ?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Look i am way to drunk to give an educated opinion to this Ill just say i am praying you are wrong

  • 4263
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    Our military is over there defending and protecting our country from terrorists . There has always been wars. Do you prefer that PRESIDENT Bush sat back and did nothing????

    He gave Sadaam Many chances to let us go in peacefully and check to see if he had chemical warfare hidden and he kept saying no for a long time..........enough time to move them to possibly Iran.

    What would you want President Bush to do after 911..........just ignore it? President Bush isn't killing our men, the Terrorists are!!

    Look also at the way the terrorists are killing in other countries on a large scale like in Africa and bombings in Madrid and other places.

  • 1 decade ago

    Bush's mad plan to invade Iraq is directly responsible for the deaths of 3000 American soldiers and almost 58,000 civilians.

    Bin Laden killed about 2,800 civilians. Who's the terrorist?

  • 1 decade ago

    Wrong..

    He performed genocide on his own Kurdish people with Chemical weapons. Sending the Military in for operations is hardly the same, don't you think?

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The claim is absurd. Hussein was killing that many people every year, if not every month.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I say WRONG, Saddam killed 200,000 Kurds alone!! Don't listen to that terrorist propaganda!!

    Source(s): god nose
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I blame bushwacker for 3000 deaths...... well 1 more years of him....AHHHH!!!!!!!

  • 1 decade ago

    any death is sad an to think that this war was on false pretences is sad.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.