Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Did super bowls I-IV really matter?
They merely were just exhibition games for bragging rights between the NFL and AFL- so was it really legitimate?
7 Answers
- Kaotik29Lv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
They mattered more than the Super Bowl does now. There were fewer playoff teams, making it harder to make it into the Playoffs, let alone the Super Bowl.
- 1 decade ago
Yes, it was a pivotal point in professional football history. Some of us old-timers remember how the upstart AFL, personified in Joe Namath.challenged the established NFL. If the AFL was going to survive as an organization and a business they would have to prove they could play with the big boys(Packers,Colts, Giants,etc). Look what happened to the USFL.
- tfoley5000Lv 71 decade ago
If you are talking about the First Two Packers super Bowls and Namath's Upset, in Super bowl 3, and KC winning super Bowl 4, Think it was Legitimate.
- Bryan MLv 51 decade ago
I think they really did matter, because they set the foundation for the Superbowl games that followed, so yes I think they were VERY important and do matter. Plus it's great NFL history.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
yea it was...because the Packers won the 1st 2 superbowls....Vince Lombardi was their coach and now the trophy is named after him...if the Packers didnt win the 1st 2 superbowls...it would be named something else...
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Which superbowl has mattered
- Anonymous1 decade ago
You youngsters shouldn't put down the things you don't understand!!
Source(s): god nose