when saying 'the youngest of the weasleys' , shd weasleys have an apostrophe or not? weasleys or weasley's?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Why worry about that when you cant even spell "Should?"

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    The youngest of the Weasleys is correct; there's no apostrophe.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Cariad
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    There should be no apostrophe.

    If you were saying something belonged to the Weasley family, then it would be like this Weasleys' eg Weasleys' pet rock

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No apostrophe cos its a plural , if you put an apostrophe in it implies possession so weasleys is correct.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Weasleys (no apostrophe)

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    no apostrophe, you're referring to a group of people who belong to the Weasley family, i.e. you want plural, not possessive

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No, as there is no possession involved. there are numerous Weasleys, this one is the youngest of the bunch

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No apostrophe. It is neither a contraction nor a possessive.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    No apostrophe.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.