ash asked in Politics & GovernmentLaw & Ethics · 1 decade ago

Shouldnt Bush have been hanged along with Saddam for crimes against Humanity?

11 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Bush and Blair between them have helped to create the whole sorry mess. Thousands of people have died because of their actions. More than 3,000 U S Service personnel and over 150 British. On top of this there are hundreds of thousands of Iraqis dead. There would have been better ways to oust Saddam than using the lies about (non-existent) 'Weapons of Mass Destruction,' Howe ver, hanging is a bit extreme. I think they should both be dismissed, stripped of any honours and receive no pensions.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    G W Bush is the President, he has not committed any crime against humanity, In fact if you give it some thought, he is keeping our country and you safe from terrorist attacks, so that you can express yourself freely, and even ask a question as you did here. Had you asked such a question about Saddam, while he was Governing Iraq, you would have disappeared never to be seen again. This is what makes the difference: you are still here.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • outler
    Lv 4
    3 years ago

    that's actual that George bush has committed crimes against humanity yet yet you are able to no longer carry close him as he's the president of u . s . a . (whether you do no longer handle him so). Now you've understood the adaptation between progressed countries and coming up countries. countries that are progressed can exercising their power on the arrival up countries. besides the undeniable fact that i think of that george bush is feeling as though he's the only guy or woman who can do away with terrorism in this international. consequently he's performing like that. I nevertheless ask your self why he has have been given a 2nd term as president of u . s . a .. perhaps he has accomplished no errors different than affirming wars on different countries. Going by utilising the present events, i think of that Pakistan is next in line for an attack by utilising u . s . a . ( George Bush)

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Other than in the minds of uneducated liberals, where has Bush been tried? Once again, the liberal fruitcakes are busily trying to violate the rights they so loudly claim to support. Why don't you sit down and carefully research the term hypocrite. It might help you better understand yourself.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Mutt
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    As long as you're at it, why not hang Clinton too. How many people did he kill with the cruise missiles he launch?

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    EXCATLY! but americans r always of the higher end of the spectrum, the top of the food chain..americans r always right. They shld dominate the wrld. americans just dont see it. They selll the weapons to saddam in the 1st place..US taxpayers r a pitiful bunch.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    of course not. he didnt do anything wrong. maybe in your views but in the eyes of the law and in the eyes of people who think he's innocent. he may be a moron but he didnt do anything worth an execution.

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    IMO no one should be hanged but GWB must burn in hell

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    bush is already dead from the neck up!

    • Login to reply the answers
  • Rich B
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    No.

    The search is your friend.

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.