# How to calculate reward to risk ratio?

stock Y has a beta of 1.5 and an expected return of 17%, stock Z has a beta of 8 and an expected return of 10.5%. If the risk free rate is 5.5% and the market risk premium is 7.5%, are these stocks correctly priced?

Using the information from question 1, what would the risk free rate have to be for the two stocks to be priced correctly?

Relevance

Solution: We need to calculate the equilibrium rates of return on the two stocks and compare them with the expected rates of return of the respective stocks. A stock would be undervalued if the expected return exceeds the equilibrium rate of return and vice versa. Now, the equilibrium rate of return for a stock is given by the following equation:

ri=rf+bi(rm-rf) where ri is the equilibrium rate of return on stock 'i', bi is its beta coefficient, rf is the risk-free rate, and rm is the market expected rate of return. Now, the equilibrium rates of return on stocks Y and Z would be as follows:

ry=.o55+1.5(.13-.055)

=.055+.1125 = .1675 < exp return of .17; hence, undervalued

rz=.055+8.0(.13-.055)

= .055+.600 + .655 > exp return of 10.5, hence, overvalued.

The rm value in the above equations is the sum of market risk premium and the risk free rate i.e., .o75+.055=.13

The second part of the question needs a second look by the asker.

• nocon
Lv 4
4 years ago

Risk Ratio Formula

• Anonymous
6 years ago

RE:

How to calculate reward to risk ratio?

stock Y has a beta of 1.5 and an expected return of 17%, stock Z has a beta of 8 and an expected return of 10.5%. If the risk free rate is 5.5% and the market risk premium is 7.5%, are these stocks correctly priced?

Using the information from question 1, what would the risk free rate have to be...

Source(s): calculate reward risk ratio: https://tr.im/ufbkX
• Anonymous
5 years ago

For the best answers, search on this site https://shorturl.im/avgcu

To calculate anything would be a waste of time. If you did calculate, you would need to factor in more than just the jackpot prize amount. You would need to include all the other prizes too. Again, it's all a giant waste of time anyway. Here is all you need to know: For every dollar the lottery company collects, it only pays out about 50 cents to winning tickets. So REGARDLESS of which lottery you choose, the payout rate is about 50%. At a 50% payback rate, no other standard form of gambling on the planet comes even close to being as bad a bet. The lottery is truly a TAX on the poor and on the ignorant. Wait - it gets worse. When you choose to play a big jackpot game, your expectation goes from 50 cents per dollar to WAY, WAY less. Perhaps as low as 10 cents on the dollar. Why? Because the overall 50% payback rate includes you occasionally hitting the jackpot! Guess what? You could buy 50 tickets per week for the next 70 years of your life, and you still would have, by any practical measure, ZERO chance of ever hitting any sort of lottery jackpot. It's simply never going to happen. So these big jackpot games are the worst "deal" for 99.9999% of the world's population out of all the lottery has to offer. (That number is not an exaggeration.) If you understand and accept everything I've told you, it leaves only 1 sane reason to play the lottery - for entertainment value! If for the cost of 1 ticket, it's worth it to give you that dream of "hitting it big", then go for it. Just wait until the jackpot is very big and once in a while buy ONE ticket. Perhaps it's worth it to you for the nice dream it will give you. Any more spent than that is a total waste of money, and it truly makes no difference which jackpot game you play. Worth repeating - the lottery is a TAX on the poor and on the ignorant.