Do our troops need to be in Iraq?

Question

I am a combat medic that conducts patrols in the Bagdhad area and this place is a definate waste of time and American money all of us think so.

Answer 1

Favorite Answer

why did you voluntarily enlist?, you could work as a civilian emt here in america!

Answer 2

Do they need to be their for our sake or Iraq's sake? I say take them out and risk the civil war and increased terrorist threat. It costs too much to leave them there and I am tired of hearing people complain about it. Doesn't matter when we leave, the violence will erupt whether it happens now or later. The Iraqi army is close to 400,000 strong so give them a chance to regulate their own country.

Answer 3

Wish you well. As can be consistant with that, personally make as few enemies as possible among the Iraqi people and as many friends as possible. Americans collectively are NOT the same as the illegally installed UNelected Dumbya Coup.

Answer 4

Should we have gone in? NO. Can we just pull out? NO. What kind of a message would that send to the rest of the world. That we will pull out even after we said we wouldn't.

Answer 5

Gee, isn't that supposed to be "unamerican" and "against our troops" to talk like that? January 2009 can't come soon enough.

Answer 6

do our troops need to be in iraq

yes, who else is going to make bushes friends billions every year

Answer 7

ofcourse they need to be in iraq...unless you and every american is willing to give up their luxorious way of life! cheap gas...etc

Answer 8

yes but u must remember that all of them will go to hell soon

Answer 9

Should not be there, never should have been there.