I mentioned that jesus took a blood oathe, is this correct?
I mean he had to submit to the will of to gake the name of Jesus/ie emannuel, and become mortal and fullfill the shedding of blood in order to become a saviour!!!
did i overstep! my understanding of this prophecy had since the days of Adam and eve that the saviour whill shed his blood?
Hamaru? but didnt jesus take an oath before he became our saviour? didnt he submit his own will to Gods' will even unto shedding blood.? i believe i see Jesus making oath of a high priest before he was born Even unto death. Otherwise there is no sacrifice in the second place?
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
thats >. we eat his meat and drink his blood from wine.
- 1 decade ago
He didn't make a blood oath it was a sacrifice. He had to shed his blood for our sins and make a new covenant.
- EVA JLv 41 decade ago
Jesus was all read a Savior when he was born he shedding his blood for our sin so we would be free
- beckychr007Lv 61 decade ago
as I understand it that is essentially correct. Rather than "oath" I think the proper term is "covenant"--it was a new covenant.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- MrsOcultyThomasLv 61 decade ago
Are you nuts?