Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Entertainment & MusicPolls & Surveys · 1 decade ago

Is O.J. Simpson guilty or innocent for murder?

What do you think. I'm not asking what the court ruled. This is a survey.

22 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Guilty. Además se dice, guilty or not guilty.

    Si fuera inocente, no hubiera huído, lo que pasa es que tuvo mucho dinero y contrató un buen abogado.

    Sorry que te conteste en pocho, pero me es más fácil.

    Una pregunta, sin que me lo tomes a mal, veo que preguntas en inglés y tienes respuestas, pero ¿no sería mejor que para tus preguntas entraras a inglés, hay muchas opciones, de EUA, de Inglaterra, etc. y contestas en español? así tendrías máqs de lo que aquí tienes.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Guilty.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Urchin
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Guilty!

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    He was found "not guilty" by a jury of his peers.. It means the same as innocent. Now as a person, you can look at the evidence and come to your own conclusion.. But after the "How I would of done it" bs... It is very clear..

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    He is guilty even though he was acquited think about the book, IF I DID IT who writes a book like that if there not guilty

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • Donna
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    Guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in my mind

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Guilty, it's just another example of the rich getting off because they can afford the best spin doctor lawyers.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 4 years ago

    the final consensus is to blame. The jury did no longer get the entire tale. working example, the Bronco chase exchange into no longer suggested by the prosecution. what's spooky is that the wide-unfold public DID get the entire tale yet a number of them cheered and threw events in the line celebrating his "innocence!" It does not get any under that. What an insult to the family individuals.

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    I honestly think he is guilty and got off

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    guilty

    • Commenter avatarLogin to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.