War against terror “who is suffering bush, us army, or innocent people”?
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
us army and about Innocent people cant say about them bcz us army protecting them and the terrorist are also between them (in Innocent people) and us army one way or other is suffering
- meatheadLv 51 decade ago
As usual, the easy answer is to blame Bush. This war against terror has everyone suffering. Mostly the innocent who live in fear in the countries infiltrated by the terrorists. As was told several years ago, this war will last generations, but, must be fought. What is the alternative ? It is how we fight it that troubles everyone. Sometimes the only way is the military, sometimes economic methods are best used. There are even times when political ways are the best. Make no mistake , we must and will defeat terrorism , because our future depends upon it.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Simple: EVERYONE SUFFERS IN WAR! Soldiers are killed. They suffer, their families suffer, their friends, both here and at home, suffer. People who make the decisions to send young men and woman into war suffer because of those decisions. The people who oppose us suffer and die, their loved one suffer. Going to war puts an unreal amount of stress on the human body. If you know someone who have been over here, look at them real close. Then look at a picture of them before they came. You will see a difference, in the eyes mostly. Look at any war time presidents before and after shots. The desicion to send young men and women to war knowing some won't come back, some will come back wounded and scard for life, many with scars on the inside you will never see, and be hated by many for it, ages them trememdously in 4 years. Personally I would rather have my stress as a soldier then the stress in the White House.Source(s): OEF-7 Afghanistan
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Definition of War against terror as per Bush is mislead by some of his close associates. Terrorism cannot be defeated by War against a country. Its a cancer in many countries perpetuated by selfish people who fill their bank accounts by the funds raised for such terrorist organisations. Only human intelligence or organisations like CIA can combat this cancer. You need to selectively track financial accounts of people involved in such activities and eliminate/erase them one by one throughout the world otherwise world cannot rest. Concern of Bush is viable that Terrorists and dictators in modern world pose threat to World Economy and also jeopardise many innocent lives. I would say Israel is more experienced in dealing with terorists.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- schrumLv 44 years ago
a conflict against terrorism isn't the answer a non violent approach is the answer to make the international a non violent place. the issue of terrorism has significant medical dimensions. Terrorism comprises using technologies and the manipulation of worry, that's something that the two scientists and engineers have long studied. The prevention of destiny assaults and the administration of present day threats require the involvement of the medical community. From the reaction of scientific experts in the instantaneous aftereffects to the artwork of engineers in designing safer homes, possible for sure see the essential function that technological know-how performs in working for the protection and wellbeing of society. The conflict against terrorism has been defined in extreme places as a conflict against a scourge, a maximum cancers that's unfold by ability of barbarians, by ability of "wicked warring parties of civilization itself."
- spareo1Lv 41 decade ago
The biggest wrong is not sending enough troops and not getting other countries to join in on stopping this relentless murderous threat. the 9/11 incident should stand as an example of what to expect if these radicals are not stopped. They already have taken Spain & we are definately on their list as well.
- ALLv 61 decade ago
You must be blind. Everyone suffers with those terrorists killing innocent people all over the world. Unless they are stopped now they will continue killing people all over the world. I would rather fight them in their own back yard as to have them in mine.
- Lee WLv 41 decade ago
As in any "war" there is enough suffering to go araound for all parties.. the point of war is to inflict MORE suffering on the enemy!
- ZabanyaLv 61 decade ago
Everyone. But Bush should get the blame for all the suffering. His policies don't go anywhere.
- 1 decade ago
Today when there is War,Like all Wars Its not those who are at war that suffer,its not the innocent People That die that suffer.
Its the families!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!