rate this trade?

is this fair..ronnie Brown, reggie bush,anquan boldin for tory holt and frank gore...which of the trade would u prefer??is it fair

10 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Best Answer

    Ronnie Brown is as good if not better tahn Frank Gore, Boldin is probably better than Tory Holt, so that alone isnt very fair, and then your throwing Reddie Bush in there too. It doesnt matter if you make this trade or not because it will be shut down by your commish, or voted against.

  • 1 decade ago

    Getting Gore and Holt is the Steal, Gore is the leading rusher in the league with 3 tds at this point and Holt is in the top 10 in rec yds and has 4 tds for 5 games. Boldin is a top 10 rec yes but he also does not have Fitz (out with a inj ) on the other side so they will be covering him well,Brown is playing for a last place team and r.bush is awsome but Mcalister is the starter. so gore and Holt are the winners.......

  • 1 decade ago

    Keep Brown, Bush, and Boldin. Worth alot more than Holt and Gore. Specially how Gore dont get goal line TD's.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Ummm keep Bush but offer him Boldin and Brown and another player for Holt and Gore man...I would get rid of Boldin immedently cus Fitzgerald is out for 2-6 weeks and since Boldin is his only target he'll be double team alot and not in that good porn way either...

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    No way man, Ronnie Brown is great, Bush is getting better, and now that Fitzgerald is injured Boldin is Leinarts only target. If you have those three forget Gore and Holt.

  • 1 decade ago

    I wouldn't veto the trade because it may be fair. With out a crystal ball I can't safely predict the better side of this trade.

    If Gore stays healthy and Brown has defenses focusing on him the Holt/Gore side might be better.

    If you need a RB for a flex position then you don't want to trade 2 for 1.

    With out knowing your teams needs and bench only you can make that call.

  • haro
    Lv 4
    3 years ago

    it fairly is a great commerce for the Patriots, even nonetheless it has the flair to be the two a great commerce for the Chiefs or a horrendous one. I nonetheless the 49ers may be attracted to Cassel, and in all probability the Vikings. yet maximum communities are staying pat with their beginning QBs, or making small p.c.. ups, or waiting for the draft. pondering the shortcoming of pastime, the Patriots have been given a solid take care of a extreme 2d around draft decision and tremendously much 18 million in new cap area. If Cassel can strengthen upon his overall performance, then it incredibly is going to likely be a solid deal for KC additionally. yet KC has no the place close to as solid an offensive line because of the fact the Patriots have. Larry Johnson feels like a stiff and Gonzalez is older and unhappy too, so Cassel will no longer be able to precisely be ecstatic to have landed in KC. in line with risk if Pioli can grab the shield that the expenditures merely released and locate himself a Dante Scarnecchia, then KC could contend interior the AFC West in some years. yet without instant offensive line help, Cassel would be working for his existence in 2009 and the Chiefs will stay woeful. The Pats desire extra useful cornerbacks, linebackers and safeties. they could use a velocity decrease back too, yet Tom Brady throwing to Randy Moss and Wes Welker solves somewhat some offensive issues. This commerce helps the Patriots to get youthful and extra useful in the process the draft and make a loose agent signing or 2 if that could desire to make experience.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I would defiantely take the first 3 over the second 2. It doesn't sound too fair in my humble opinion.

  • 1 decade ago

    brown bush boldin is the better side in my opinion

  • 1 decade ago

    no, it's not fair.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.