? asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

妳的翻譯能力如何呢???幫忙翻譯這段文章...

以下的文章是有關資源回收的

Opinions range widely over how much solid waste can be easily recycled. A citizen recycling program in Wilton(地名) and several other New Hampshire(地名) towns recycles 45 percent of its solid waste. New European mechanical systems can prepare all of the waste stream for recycling.

Neil Seldman(人名), who has investigated waste-handling systems in much of the world for the institute for Local Self- Reliance, says that up to 80 percent of the United States\' waste stream could readily be recycled, \" and at half the cost of current plans for long-term hauling and incineration if it\'s done properly.\"

By\"properly\" Mr. Seldman(人名) means recycling programs must be funded and managed by officals who do more than pay lip service to the concept. Too often, Seldman says, a city will call for recycling a quarter to its waste, but with only 1 or 2 percent of its solid-waste management budget. And cities seeking to recycle are faced with a chicken-or-egg problem. For recycling to pay off, there must be a market for the raw materials generared; but it\'s difficult to get buyers for the raw material until they can be assured of a steady supply.

請不要用翻譯軟體 直接貼上來

儘量整理過 意思通順

Update:

補一個 放在一開始的第一句

But is recycling a practical solution?

4 Answers

Rating
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Opinions range widely over how much solid waste can be easily recycled. A citizen recycling program in Wilton(地名) and several other New Hampshire(地名) towns recycles 45 percent of its solid waste. New European mechanical systems can prepare all of the waste stream for recycling.

    有多少固體垃圾能輕易地被回收?各方意見分歧。Wilton跟其它New Hampshire的城鎮回收了45%的固態垃圾。新歐洲機械系統則可以回收全部的垃圾量。

    Neil Seldman(人名), who has investigated waste-handling systems in much of the world for the institute for Local Self- Reliance, says that up to 80 percent of the United States' waste stream could readily be recycled, " and at half the cost of current plans for long-term hauling and incineration if it's done properly."

    Neil Seldman研究世界各地的垃圾處理系統,以利於地方自立機構的運作,他表示,全美80%的垃圾量可以毫無困難地被回收,而且,如果處理妥善的話,只需要花費現在長程拖運及焚燒的一半經費。

    By"properly" Mr. Seldman(人名) means recycling programs must be funded and managed by officals who do more than pay lip service to the concept. Too often, Seldman says, a city will call for recycling a quarter to its waste, but with only 1 or 2 percent of its solid-waste management budget. And cities seeking to recycle are faced with a chicken-or-egg problem. For recycling to pay off, there must be a market for the raw materials generared; but it's difficult to get buyers for the raw material until they can be assured of a steady supply.

    所謂的「妥善處理」,Seldman指的是回收計劃需由不只是做做場面的官員們來籌款及處理。太多這樣的例子:一個城市宣稱可以回收四分之一的圾圾量,卻只有1%~2%的處理預算。想要實行回收計劃的城市往往面臨雞生蛋,蛋生雞的兩難。為了支付回收費用,一定要有個市場願意回收原料,但在回收制度未健全之前,但這個市場很難吸引買家。

    【希望可以幫上忙。】

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    有需要可以找我..

    dearjindearjin36@yahoo.com.tw

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    地名:

    Wilton

    威爾頓絨氈

    New Hampshire

    新罕布夏(美國州名)

    人名..自己照唸起來的發音翻即可

    • Login to reply the answers
  • 1 decade ago

    Opinions range widely over 有多少固體廢棄物可以輕易地被再利用。在Wilton和New Hampshire的其他幾個城市,有一個市區資源回收計畫(這樣翻是因為照字面翻總覺得怪怪的... 市民回收計畫,要把市民回收?翻成市區資源回收計畫,英文的字面上不對,不過就中文字義來說反而比較通暢。 ^^"),將45%的固體廢棄物回收再利用(沒有把its=它的翻譯出來,也是因為以純粹我的個人主觀來看,這樣中文比較順。後面可能還有這樣的狀況吧,就不再多說了。 ^^")。 新的歐洲機械系統(這個翻譯也有點問題,雖然我找不到相關資料,不過感覺上New European mechanical systems也可能是某個廠商或計畫的名稱;這裡我先直接翻譯,如果真是專有名詞,那其實可翻可不翻,甚至保持原文會比較好。) 可以策畫出所有廢棄物的回收物流。Neil Seldman針對當地自力處理的原則,研究世界上大部分的廢棄物管理/處理系統,闡明了美國的廢棄物物流有80%以上可以毫不費力地再利用,『而且如果正確地執行,在長期的搬運與焚化方面,只需現行計畫的一半成本。』所謂『正確』,先生所指的是,回收計畫必須由不只會說應酬話的官員們為這個概念提供資金並管理。Seldman說最常聽到的狀況是,一個城市需要回收1/4的廢棄物, 卻只編列了廢棄物管理經費的1或2%作為預算。而且許多企圖回收廢棄物的城市都面臨了雞或蛋的問題(先有雞還是先有蛋)。想要成功地回收廢棄物再利用,必須為生產出來的原料創造出一條銷售通路; 但是除非他們可以確保穩定的供應,否則找到原料的買家會很困難。(換句話說,沒有買方的資金就無法確保再生原料的生產,可是沒有穩定供應的產品就無法吸引買主;先有雞還是先有蛋,先有生產還是先有買賣,兩難。)

    2006-02-23 05:46:24 補充:

    補充的這句但是資源回收是一種實用的解決方式嗎?

    2006-02-23 05:53:19 補充:

    突然發現第一句我沒有完全翻到,失誤^^"Opinions range widely over how much solid waste can be easily recycled.意見遠比可被輕易回收的固體廢棄物還多。

    • Login to reply the answers
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.