Anonymous
Anonymous asked in 社會與文化語言 · 2 decades ago

這是份英文報告請大家幫我翻譯一下好嗎?急需~~

Legislators, interpreters, and disasters

The importance of how as well as what is a disaster

We were invited to comment on the six papers that appeared in the special issue of the International Jaurnal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters (IJMED) each addressing the question “What is a Disaster?” We were also asked to offer our own answer to this question. It will become clear to you as we proceed that we do not think there is one answer to this question, or indeed, just one question to ask. We do , however, think we are engaged in a worthy discussion in so far as it is an occasion to talk frankly about sociology and disaster.

We begin with two observations we made while reading the special issue. First, while we have more data about disasters than at any other time, we are also less certain about just what a disaster is. Indeed, there is almost an inverse (and seemingly perverse ) logic at play here : the more we know about specific disasters the more definitions of disaster are registered in the literature. And second, it appears sociologists who work within the classic model of disaster research are not seriously considering work by other social scientists who are not a part of the classical tradition, and thus risk being overtaken by develop-ments that according to their paradigm ought not to exist.

請大家幫我英翻中,我想要的順一點的,不要拘泥於英文單字上,更不要用翻譯機直接翻出來的,就像在念中文文章一樣順,謝謝大家!!

Update:

拜託大家,我急需~~

2 Answers

Rating
  • 2 decades ago
    Favorite Answer

    立法者,翻譯和災難

    什麼是一個災難的重要性

    我們被邀請對6 份文件作評論, 那在群眾緊急事件和災難(IJMED)的國際Jaurnal的公債特別發行裡似乎每一個處理‥What是一個災難的問題嗎? 〃我們也被要提供我們自己的這個問題的答案。 它 將變得對你清楚,當我們進行時,我們認為沒有一這個問題的答案,或者的確,要問的僅僅一個問題。 就關於社會學和災難坦白交談是一個機會來說,我們確實,不過,認為我們從事一個有價值的討論。

    我們從我們在讀公債特別發行時做的兩篇報告開始。 首先,當與在任何其他時間相比較,我們有更多的關於災難的數據時,我們也不那么確信正好一個災難是什麼。 的確,這裡在玩幾乎有倒轉的(並且好像執拗)邏輯︰ 我們更了解災難的更多定義被在文學內記錄的具體的災難。 其次是, 它似乎社會學家, 誰在災難研究的典型模型內工作沒認真地透過不是經典道統的一部分的其他社會科學家考慮工作, 因此危險被根據他們的範例不應該存在的發展ments 突然襲擊。

  • 2 decades ago

    立法委員、口譯員和災難

    災害情況如何和什麼是災害的重要。

    我們被邀請評論六份在IJMED期刊中有關什麼是災害的議題。我們也被請求提供自己的見解。當我們繼續說明不只有一個答案或問題時,會更明確。然而,我們真的認為這是非常好的機會我們可以率直的討論社會學和災難。

    我們從讀此議題中開始。第一,當我們有充份資源時,我們對此的了解也很少。甚至,我們對特別災害更多了解,在字面上就有更多的解釋。第二,在典型災害研究範圍內的社會學家不跟其他不屬於典型的社會學家一起研究,因此,根據他們不應該生存的範圍內,發展的風險很大。

    可能請你自己在潤稿一下比較好,必竟我不是這行的專家。希望對你有幫助!

    Source(s): myself
Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.