Anonymous
Anonymous asked in 社會與文化語言 · 1 decade ago

請幫我將這段英文翻譯成中文意思!!

Justice Stewart voted to strike the law examined in Zablocki because it contained no exception for those who were truly indigent and could not afford to pay their child support obligations. Like Justice Powell, he found that the law was not a reasonable means of furthering important state interests. But Justice Stewart found no purpose in using equal protection language when “the doctrine is no more than substantive due process by another name.” Justice Stewart believed that recognition of the use of substantive due process demonstrates why the Supreme Court should be hesitant to reject the decisions of the democratic process concerning important social questions.

因為課程的需要,極需這段中文意思,希望能翻的流暢些!!

不希望是使用線上翻譯,謝謝!!

3 Answers

Rating
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Justice Stewart voted to strike the law examined in Zablocki because it

    contained no exception for those who were truly indigent and could not

    afford to pay their child support obligations. Stewart法官對於在Zablocki一案中投了否決性的一票 因為此案對於真正無法負擔支付子女的膳養費者沒有任何的通融Like Justice Powell, he

    found that the law was not a reasonable means of furthering important

    state interests. 像Powell法官 Stewart法官指出此案沒有繼續下去的必要(沒有實際的理由 讓州政府沒有興趣再追訴下去)But Justice Stewart found no purpose in using equal

    protection language when “the doctrine is no more than substantive due

    process by another name.”但是Stewart法官指出當政策只是法律程序的另一個名字時 沒有理由使用平等保護(法律)用語 Justice Stewart believed that recognition of

    the use of substantive due process demonstrates why the Supreme Court

    should be hesitant to reject the decisions of the democratic process

    concerning important social questions.Stewart法官相信認可法律程序 顯示最高法院應該遲緩判決任何與民主成長有關的社會問題案件的速度

    2005-12-06 00:54:14 補充:

    她不希望是使用線上翻譯野 呆a笨豬=(00)=

    Source(s): I tried my best this is hard hard hard
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    正義斯圖爾特投票攻擊在 Zablocki 被調查的法律因為它為那些真實貧乏而且無法負擔支付他們的孩子支持義務的人沒包含例外。像正義鮑爾,他發現法律不是促進重要的州興趣的合理方法。 但是正義斯圖爾特在使用相等的保護語言方面沒發現目的當”教義是另一個名字的沒有於實質正當法律程序。”正義斯圖爾特相信 u 的承認

    Source(s): 網址!
  • 1 decade ago

    正義Stewart 投票碰撞法律被審查在Zablocki 因為它沒有包含例外為那些真實地貧困, 不能支付他們的撫養費義務。像正義Powell, 他發現法律不是促進重要狀態興趣合理的手段。但法官Stewart 沒有發現目的在使用相等的保護語言當..the 教條是沒有比實質適當過程由其它命名... 法官Stewart 相信, 對實質的適當過程的用途的認識展示為什麼最高法院應該是猶豫reject 民主過程的決定關於重要社會問題。

    給你個好用的網址,希望有幫到忙,能翻譯多國語言(參考資料)。

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.