The following appeared as part of an article in a magazine devoted regional life.
“Corporations should look to the city of Helios when seeking new business opportunities or a new location. Even in the recent recession, Helios’s unemployment rate was lower than the regional average. It is the industrial center of the region, and historically it has provided more than its share of the region’s manufacturing jobs. On addition, Helios is attempting to expand its economic base by attracting companies that focus on research and development of innovative technologies.”
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
以下出現作為一篇文章一部分在雜誌虔誠地方生活中。 "公司應該看對Helios 城市當尋找新商機或一個新地點。在最近後退, Helios 的失業率比地方平均低。這是區域的工業中心, 並且它比區域的製造業工作的它的份額歷史上提供了更多。在加法, Helios 試圖擴展它的經濟基地由吸引集中於創新技術的研究與發展的公司。" 談論多麼恰當辯解您發現這個論據。在您的討論是肯定分析推理線和對證據的用途在論據。例如, 您可能需要考慮什麼可疑的假定強調想法並且什麼供選擇的解釋或反例也許減弱結論。您能並且談論什麼類證據會加強或會反駁論據, 什麼變化在論據上會使它更加邏輯上酣然, 並且什麼, 如果任何, 會幫助您更好評估它的結論。