For those who say that a certain theory is not fact, did you know that the effects of gravity is a theory?

There is literally overwhelming verifiable, reliable, quantifiable and valid evidence, meticulously gathered and examined, sorted, codified and collected that clearly demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that evolution from protein strands to one celled creatures, cell colonies, to plants, insects, fish,... show more There is literally overwhelming verifiable, reliable, quantifiable and valid evidence, meticulously gathered and examined, sorted, codified and collected that clearly demonstrates beyond a shadow of a doubt that evolution from protein strands to one celled creatures, cell colonies, to plants, insects, fish, reptiles, birds and mammals has taken place on this planet.
How gravity works is also a theory and, in fact, we know less about how gravity works then we do about how evolution took place.
Simply labeling a process a "theory" does not in any way, shape manner or form diminish the accuracy of the same.

Do creationist also refute the theory of gravity?
Update: Atoms and their constituant parts are not theoretical having been observed in experiments in partical excellorators.
Update 2: The law of gravity is explained in the theory of gravitational attraction, which discusses the "G" force and is extremely difficult to mathematicially describe when more than two bodies are invovled.
Update 3: The evolutionary process does not attempt nor was it ever intended to "destroy" the bible, a contradictory work that began to self destruct long before Darwin ever put pen to paper. Evolution simply explains the process of how complex life forms developed and, in fact, it might be employed by... show more The evolutionary process does not attempt nor was it ever intended to "destroy" the bible, a contradictory work that began to self destruct long before Darwin ever put pen to paper.

Evolution simply explains the process of how complex life forms developed and, in fact, it might be employed by creationist to more accurately describe how the god or supreme being they profess to believe in supposedly created life with having said god do a magic trick.

Those who deny the possibility of evolution are clearly attempting to limit a being that they profess is unlimited which demonstrates a tremendous amount of ego on the parts of those person who are so trying to impose said limitations.
Update 4: The effects and the process of evolution are and have long been observable. That is precisely what Mr. Darwin did. He observed nature and investigated the same and employed his ability to reason deductively. The gift of reasoning might be the greatest gift given by god but, sadly, few who profess to be its... show more The effects and the process of evolution are and have long been observable. That is precisely what Mr. Darwin did. He observed nature and investigated the same and employed his ability to reason deductively.

The gift of reasoning might be the greatest gift given by god but, sadly, few who profess to be its followers seem to well utilize the same.
Update 5: Thank you, Martin G.
Update 6: Thank you, Law and Order...
Update 7: Servant Leader, this one is not refuting the fact of gravity. You jump , as a creationist you would be the one who refutes theories.
Update 8: Thank you, Aviator.
Update 9: Thank you, Eric.
Update 10: Truth Speaker, who said we were addressing the issue of possible life forms on any planet other than Earth?
Update 11: Rez Rostov, nicely put. Good show.
Update 12: Wikpedia is an online referrence that can be editted by anyone, anyone can make entries or contribute to the same. It is never peer reveiwed or evaluated and is very often in error. This one, prior to the advent of computers in the home and for personal use, found it a much wiser course of action to attend... show more Wikpedia is an online referrence that can be editted by anyone, anyone can make entries or contribute to the same. It is never peer reveiwed or evaluated and is very often in error.

This one, prior to the advent of computers in the home and for personal use, found it a much wiser course of action to attend several colleges and universities while earning of all things, degrees in physics and astral physicis, as well as philosphy, theology and education.

This one is not refuting creationism but the anti-intellectual bias of the majority of creationist who seem to have an unrational fear of science and who often become blind in the face of facts yet cling happily to a belief that has nothing but personal belief to support it.

It would be so much easier and probably much more accurate and correct to admit that if a god exist, it might have used the evolutionalry process to create life.

Nothing in the Torah or the Holy Qur'an refutes such a possibility.
Update 13: So many knicker in a twist ( or a knot).

This one does not give thumbs down and only gives a thumbs up to those who demonstrate that the grey matter is active.

Sleep well, all.
26 answers 26