• Where is god?

    14 answers · Green Living · 8 hours ago
  • Please tell what your thoughts are on climate change and then tell your belief or non-belief in God. The more details, the better.?

    Best answer: "Climate change" aka "global warming", is a lie put out there to control populations. Those that scream the loudest about it, have private jets and mansion estates. That should tell you all you need to know. Don't be deceived by worldly "authorities". -----. The truth is that... show more
    Best answer: "Climate change" aka "global warming", is a lie put out there to control populations. Those that scream the loudest about it, have private jets and mansion estates. That should tell you all you need to know. Don't be deceived by worldly "authorities".

    -----.

    The truth is that Jesus loves you and wants to bless your life freely :) Most of all, Jesus wants you with Him forever, and not in hell. The truth is that every belief except one will lead to eternal torment in the lake of fire for every person. Because nothing pays for our sins except the death and blood of Jesus, the sacrifice of Jesus that is already accomplished by Him . Jesus loves you! The truth is that Jesus is God, and Jesus died on the cross to pay for all of our sins in full, and then Jesus resurrected from the dead. Nothing else pays for our sins, not works, not deeds, not religions. So the only way to heaven and to avoid hell, is by believing in Jesus for eternal life (John 6:47), without adding any of your own works (Romans 4:5). Believe in Jesus to take you to heaven, and you will be in heaven, no matter what, guaranteed. That easy, thanks to Jesus! Tell Jesus that you thank Him that you will be with Him in heaven when you die, because you believe in Jesus! It is too late to be saved, after death.
    31 answers · Global Warming · 4 days ago
  • Will global warming make Antarctica habitable?

    Best answer: Well, as others have pointed out, Antarctica is already habitable. Not only do animal species live there but we humans have a permanent presence on the continent with our scientific stations. However, if you look around the coast and use some of the worst case projections of a 7C rise in temperature by 2200, then... show more
    Best answer: Well, as others have pointed out, Antarctica is already habitable. Not only do animal species live there but we humans have a permanent presence on the continent with our scientific stations.

    However, if you look around the coast and use some of the worst case projections of a 7C rise in temperature by 2200, then parts of Antarctica will begin to resemble parts of Norway and Sweden where there are villages.
    16 answers · Global Warming · 2 days ago
  • Big cat rescue?

    I’m currently in veterinary medicine school and I’m going to specialize in exotic animals such as big cats. My husband is studying to be a neurosurgeon, and our plan is to move to either Texas or Africa and start a small, 10 acre sanctuary for big cats such as lions, tigers, and cheetahs. Cheetah’s are almost... show more
    I’m currently in veterinary medicine school and I’m going to specialize in exotic animals such as big cats. My husband is studying to be a neurosurgeon, and our plan is to move to either Texas or Africa and start a small, 10 acre sanctuary for big cats such as lions, tigers, and cheetahs. Cheetah’s are almost entirely illegal to own in the US so if we decided to live in Texas, we wouldn’t be able to rescue any. But our other option is Botswana, Africa. The only reason we would move there is IF there is a possibility of rescuing injured/abandoned wild cheetahs in hopes of release, or rescuing pet cheetahs from incapable owners. I know that it is legal to own Cheetahs in Africa but I am not sure which countries. So that is my question, which countries in Africa is it legal to own Cheetahs? I’d also like to state that these animals would not be pets, I would adopt them in hopes of changing their lives for the better. I don’t support exotic pet trade
    7 answers · Conservation · 15 hours ago
  • What evidence is there that China will lower its greenhouse gas emissions?

    Best answer: There is no evidence that China will lower its emissions because they have agreed with Obama to increase them dramatically. Their agreements are worthless anyway but they didn't even pretend to care about reducing emissions. They'll take money if we give it to them and they will be very happy if we... show more
    Best answer: There is no evidence that China will lower its emissions because they have agreed with Obama to increase them dramatically. Their agreements are worthless anyway but they didn't even pretend to care about reducing emissions. They'll take money if we give it to them and they will be very happy if we decrease ours because that will make them more economically competitive but they aren't going to reduce CO2 emissions anytime soon.
    18 answers · Global Warming · 4 days ago
  • Is this statement about the UN_IPCC true? And even if true, is the assured outcome really scientifically correct?

    "The IPCC is a review and recommendation body. It works almost like a scientific conference - scientists from around the world come together to review the papers that were published and then try to reach some conclusion in terms of climate change."
    "The IPCC is a review and recommendation body. It works almost like a scientific conference - scientists from around the world come together to review the papers that were published and then try to reach some conclusion in terms of climate change."
    9 answers · Global Warming · 2 days ago
  • Which is more likely to be true?

    "“If left unchecked, the damage caused by climate change will cause untold human suffering and significant damage to the U.S. economy,” Schumer wrote to Trump on Dec. 6." OR "“If left unchecked, the damage caused by illegal immigration will cause untold human suffering and significant damage to... show more
    "“If left unchecked, the damage caused by climate change will cause untold human suffering and significant damage to the U.S. economy,” Schumer wrote to Trump on Dec. 6." OR "“If left unchecked, the damage caused by illegal immigration will cause untold human suffering and significant damage to the U.S. economy,” Schumer wrote to Trump on Dec. 6.
    8 answers · Global Warming · 1 day ago
  • Why do oil countries have a higher per capita global warming emissions?

    The list is topped by the likes of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait.
    The list is topped by the likes of Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait.
    13 answers · Global Warming · 4 days ago
  • What can we do in our daily lives to help the environment?

    Best answer: Less plastic, less oil, less of bad other stuff and taking part in events that will help the environment.
    Best answer: Less plastic, less oil, less of bad other stuff and taking part in events that will help the environment.
    5 answers · Green Living · 1 day ago
  • Tips for cutting down on plastic use?

    I've found a few solutions so far: * Using steel straws *Replacing clingfilm with beeswax cloth or silicon lids * Using ribbon instead of cellotape to seal wrapped presents * I'm looking for steel tubs for bath cooking portions of food. * Cutting down on online shopping * Canvas shopping bags Any... show more
    I've found a few solutions so far: * Using steel straws *Replacing clingfilm with beeswax cloth or silicon lids * Using ribbon instead of cellotape to seal wrapped presents * I'm looking for steel tubs for bath cooking portions of food. * Cutting down on online shopping * Canvas shopping bags Any other easy things to cut out I've not thought of?
    7 answers · Green Living · 4 days ago
  • Do advocates for climate change have evidence for human-caused climate change? Or do they just commit the *** hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy?

    Best answer: There s no credible quantifiable evidence of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming or Anthropogenic Global Warming. The ADVOCATES are in three classes: (1) Those that are really duped because of low IQ or they are too lazy to think for themselves. (2) Those that know it is BS (Bad Science) but need the... show more
    Best answer: There s no credible quantifiable evidence of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming or Anthropogenic Global Warming.

    The ADVOCATES are in three classes:

    (1) Those that are really duped because of low IQ or they are too lazy to think for themselves.

    (2) Those that know it is BS (Bad Science) but need the money that Soros and Steyer pay out or for other personal reasons which are usually evil.

    (3) Then those who know it is a con game but want to gain power or riches. These are obviously greedy self serving individuals who have numerous times demonstrated their lack of compassion for humankind or the physical Earth. Their end agenda is totalitarianism with them in control: Don't believe me? Just look at their stated objective:

    It is this “recasting of American values” that is precisely what attorney and environmental activist Daniel Sitarz, the author of the authoritative version of Agenda 21, referred to when in 1992, at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, he stated:
    “Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level."

    See what I mean?
    17 answers · Global Warming · 1 week ago
  • Did you know that a group called "Science is Never Settled" is exhibiting at the AMS meeting?

    Best answer: Well, I had a look on the exhibitor site but other than a brief summary, I couldn't find any information about the group ... maybe you have a link to their website? My experience at such meetings (not related to climatology or meteorology though) is that you always have a few 'outsider' groups who show... show more
    Best answer: Well, I had a look on the exhibitor site but other than a brief summary, I couldn't find any information about the group ... maybe you have a link to their website?

    My experience at such meetings (not related to climatology or meteorology though) is that you always have a few 'outsider' groups who show up. In my area that tends to be the anti-vaccination groups, and also anti-abortion pro-lifers. I say 'outsider' here, just to clarify, in the sense that they're lobby groups rather than companies exhibiting products or researchers presenting studies.

    In any case, I presume the people wanting to exhibit at the AMS meeting have to pay a registration fee so the organisers probably don't really care once they get the attendee money. And it's good to have a mixed bag of exhibitors because it makes things more interesting.

    The bottom-line though, like everything else, is that no one is forced to listen to them so there's probably no harm in taking their money knowing the majority attending will ignore them.
    10 answers · Global Warming · 6 days ago