Best answer:
It isn't a 100%, always, thing. And it isn't always irresponsible so much as ignorant.
At least 70% of temperament is genetic, enough so that the dogs on the ends of the stable-unstable spectrum cannot be changed by any form of handling, training, or management. There are bomb-proof dogs out there that NO...
show more
Best answer: It isn't a 100%, always, thing. And it isn't always irresponsible so much as ignorant.
At least 70% of temperament is genetic, enough so that the dogs on the ends of the stable-unstable spectrum cannot be changed by any form of handling, training, or management. There are bomb-proof dogs out there that NO ONE could make unstable. There are nervous wrecks out there that NO ONE could make safe. It is only the middle dogs that owners really make a difference for.
Even then, again, it's 70% genetic! I think that the largest part of the correlation is that part of being a responsible owner is knowing your dog's limits and even putting them down if it becomes necessary. An irresponsible owner will take a fearful dog out over it's depth and the dog will break or bite, the same dog with the same level of instability will not be put in that situation by a responsible owner.
17 answers
·
Dogs
·
2 days ago