• Can anything still be morally wrong if the majority wants it?

    How do you know its really wrong in that case? rel·a·tiv·ism ˈrelədəˌvizəm/Submit noun the doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context, and are not absolute.
    How do you know its really wrong in that case? rel·a·tiv·ism ˈrelədəˌvizəm/Submit noun the doctrine that knowledge, truth, and morality exist in relation to culture, society, or historical context, and are not absolute.
    43 answers · Philosophy · 3 days ago
  • Religion and spirituality how many people did The Atheist Joseph Stalin order killed?

    Best answer: Tens of millions upwards of sixty

    But the Atheist Uncle Mao put them all to shame 100+ million
    Best answer: Tens of millions upwards of sixty

    But the Atheist Uncle Mao put them all to shame 100+ million
    16 answers · History · 2 hours ago
  • What is the biggest Lie?

    27 answers · Philosophy · 2 days ago
  • Most Famous Gay Man In History?

    Best answer: James Buchanan and J. Edgar Hoover were both rumored to be in the closet. In addition to the other famous names already listed, I would add Walt Whitman, Alan Touring, Truman Capote and Liberace.
    Best answer: James Buchanan and J. Edgar Hoover were both rumored to be in the closet. In addition to the other famous names already listed, I would add Walt Whitman, Alan Touring, Truman Capote and Liberace.
    13 answers · Mental Health · 6 hours ago
  • Name for the nickname sunny??

    Best answer: As you say, her personality is completely irrelevant to her real name. You already have a nickname that implies a cheerful optimistic personality. For her real name, you need to think about her parents - their ethnicity, personalities, tastes, and hopes for their child's future. That's where people's... show more
    Best answer: As you say, her personality is completely irrelevant to her real name. You already have a nickname that implies a cheerful optimistic personality. For her real name, you need to think about her parents - their ethnicity, personalities, tastes, and hopes for their child's future. That's where people's given names come from!
    16 answers · Books & Authors · 2 days ago
  • Do you think old doors at worth a lot?

    I have a SOLID OAK FRONT DOOR from 1900. I think this is worth lots of dollars because it’s an archive? I don’t know what do with this 20th century wooden door, I rarely use it and it’s sitting my garage collecting dust.
    I have a SOLID OAK FRONT DOOR from 1900. I think this is worth lots of dollars because it’s an archive? I don’t know what do with this 20th century wooden door, I rarely use it and it’s sitting my garage collecting dust.
    16 answers · History · 24 hours ago
  • Explain differences between playing violin and guitar?

    So I’m not a master violinist of any sorts but I played in school and am lucky enough to own one to play for fun every now and then- which my friends think is pretty cool (a plus). Well one of them is pretty musically inclined (they play guitar) and wanted to jam out together. I told them I do t really do that-... show more
    So I’m not a master violinist of any sorts but I played in school and am lucky enough to own one to play for fun every now and then- which my friends think is pretty cool (a plus). Well one of them is pretty musically inclined (they play guitar) and wanted to jam out together. I told them I do t really do that- it’s hard to just break out a violin, like you need space for the bow and if your on the couch you sink in and it’s hard to play etc etc. I’m also not the most confident in my abilities. Anyways we end up kind of doing it but they got increasingly frustrated I wasn’t able to “go with the flow” and saying as long as it’s in the same key it’ll be fine. Anyways my question is: is there really a difference in approaching playing guitar vs violin? I feel like violinist are expected to play more complicated melodies and guitar (especially acoustic) is meant more so to accompany- which is probably where the disparity came from. Though I’m sure my barely average playing abilities contributed. Still I found it very interesting. Thoughts?
    6 answers · Performing Arts · 21 hours ago
  • If the Nazis had dinosaurs, could they have won WWII?

    Best answer: As weapons, nowhere close. Pteranodons (recon?) were weak & slow and Tyrannosaurs were tall, highly-visible targets. A few mortar shells would down a huge theropod long before it could reach anyone. The latter also had the drawback of requiring vast amounts of meat. You could feed them human casualties, but using... show more
    Best answer: As weapons, nowhere close. Pteranodons (recon?) were weak & slow and Tyrannosaurs were tall, highly-visible targets. A few mortar shells would down a huge theropod long before it could reach anyone.

    The latter also had the drawback of requiring vast amounts of meat. You could feed them human casualties, but using Allied dead would provide a propaganda weapon and using Axis dead would cause morale problems, so that would leave Holocaust casualties. Shipping the bodies from Poland to the front would be unsanitary, and murdering victims (or providing them to be devoured live) at the front would be bad for morale, logistics, and secrecy.

    The main problems are that dinos 1) don't use ranged weapons and 2) are stupid. Raptors are fast and *might* work for fights where they can get close enough (like nighttime or against forest partisans), but wars are won with logistics. My own choice would be cloned mammoths to pull supply wagons through the Russian cold & mud, provided I could feed them.
    15 answers · History · 24 hours ago
  • What year did Germany liberate Poland?

    20 answers · History · 2 days ago
  • What did people do before the Internet was invented?

    Did they frolic in the wilds?
    Did they frolic in the wilds?
    90 answers · History · 6 days ago
  • In order to be sane, would you have to be the most intelligent person ever?

    Is a belief only false if it can be disproven? If two people are having a conversation, and say person A. states "I am GOD" and uses logic and reasoning to ascertain his claim, and the listener B. can not disprove the persons logic, technially the belief is not false according to person B? No matter how... show more
    Is a belief only false if it can be disproven? If two people are having a conversation, and say person A. states "I am GOD" and uses logic and reasoning to ascertain his claim, and the listener B. can not disprove the persons logic, technially the belief is not false according to person B? No matter how crazy or unlikely the claim appears to be? Now if person A. made the same unlikely claim to another listener C, and uses the same logic and reasoning, but listener C can poke holes and disprove the logic person C. can say person A has false beliefs right? Is the smartest person the only sane person? Does it seem like I may have a low IQ?
    13 answers · Philosophy · 1 day ago
  • Does Donald Trump have explosive diarrhea?

    Best answer: That's just him talking, it's hard to tell the difference
    Best answer: That's just him talking, it's hard to tell the difference
    16 answers · Poetry · 3 days ago