Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved. http://answers.yahoo.com/my/profile?show=NjZ9pKyfaa Yahoo! Answers: Questions from ClayMeow en-us Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:23:09 GMT 3 142 18 http://answers.yahoo.com/ http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/sch/gr/ga_ans_badge.gif http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070617203624AAkdrHI http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070617203624AAkdrHI Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:36:24 GMT I'm a lifelong Yankees fan, and love Torre, but sometimes he makes such baffling decisions. For those who weren't following the game tonight, Chien-Ming Wang pitched brilliantly, including achieving a career-high 10 K's. He let up a run in the 9th inning to make it 8-2 Yankees, but then got a double-play to clear the bases. So it's the 9th inning, 2 outs, and nobody on. He just needs one out for a complete game, and yet Torre someone yanks him. Wang threw 113 pitches, so if it was the matter of pitch count, he probably would have been taken out before that point, besideswhich, what's 3-10 more pitches? I just don't understand the decision. He deserved the complete game. Does someone care to rationalize the decision? http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070505185236AAJYKN1 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070505185236AAJYKN1 Sun, 06 May 2007 01:52:36 GMT If Eli sucks again and/or the Giants don't make the playoffs again, do you think Eli's time in NY is done? Furthermore, if that does happen, do you think what NY did to get him was the worst draft move in the history of the NFL? UncleRico, 3000+ Yds and 24TDs means shit when he's been at the bottom of the league in completion % and QB Rating, and towards the top in Interceptions. But hey, if you want to focus on just two stats, go right ahead. He's not only not as good as Peyton, but he's also not as good as most QBs in the league. He's mediocre at best. In addition, QBs are supposed to be leaders, and he's always so mopey on the sidelines. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070501195414AAmFq24 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070501195414AAmFq24 Wed, 02 May 2007 02:54:14 GMT Briere was interviewed a short while ago, right after the game. I'm a Rangers fan, but I have to say I was extrememely impressed by his demeanor, poise and honesty. He said he hadn't had a chance to watch the replay of the no-goal at the end of the game, but said that he hoped the league got it correct because he admitted that they blew it the game before with Rachunek's goal being waived off for the Rangers. I thought it really showed his character that he blatantly said that Rachunek's goal should have counted. I can see why he's (co-) captain. Maybe Briere should teach Ruff how to be a gentleman and real stand-up guy. I've got a lot of respect for Briere now. thehabsfan, the question is/was not whether there was an intentional kick, the question was whether there was even a distinct kicking motion. A distinct kicking motion is what the rule states, and everyone and their mother could clearly see there was no distinct kicking motion. Briere knows it, and I'm sure the other Sabres know it too. Rangers went on to win G3 anyways, so it didn't make a difference (which may be one reason Briere doesn't mind admitting that that was a goal), but don't go act like you know something if you don't understand the rules and what actually caused the goal to be waived off. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070428230602AArvT75 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070428230602AArvT75 Sun, 29 Apr 2007 06:06:02 GMT A-Rod was taking all sorts of criticism for the number of errors he had last season, but I've heard little about Mike Lowell's (Red Sox) struggles this year, a fellow third baseman like A-Rod. Lowell had two more errors today against the Yanks to give him 8 errors in only 22 games. This is a former gold glover! So what's going on with him? Do you think Boston fans should start worrying? Do you think it's early? Has he acquired Knoblauch-itis? Mike Lowell is the 3B for Boston: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/players/stats?playerId=3972&context=fielding http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070409140758AAWmHk7 http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070409140758AAWmHk7 Mon, 09 Apr 2007 21:07:58 GMT Well as a Ranger fan, I think we match up well and should be able to walk away with the series in 6 games. Rangers have the experience, youth, talent, superb goaltending and they've been really clicking over the past month or so (ever since they acquired Avery). I think the Rangers are the dark horse this year and will surprise a lot of people. 90% of their losses is because they do something stupid (like putting the puck in their own net), so I think if they control that and don't take stupid penalties, they can matchup with any team 5-on-5. But I'd like to hear some unbiased thoughts on the matchup. I see a few people here picking Atlanta to win the cup....I just don't see it. If you want "best answer", don't simply say "Rangers rule!" or "Rangers suck!" or "Thrashers rule!" or "Thrashers suck!" Back up your claim please :). And if you're a fan of neither team, even better. Thank you. You mean Lundqvist, not Holmqvist (Holmqvist is on TB). But I agree with your assessment.