Assuming you are talking about the kits or plans from places like www agua-luna com or water 4 gas or from any number of venders let me tell you it won’t and can’t work.
Assuming your engine is in perfect tune, you get about 20%-to 37% the energy you put into it back as work, you lose about 7% to friction and the rest is lost in the cooling system and exhaust. Now assuming your alternator is 55% efficient, and let do the math.
Gasoline has 18,000 BTUs per pound.
So now we have 18,000 BTUs to play with, assuming we have a very efficient engine we start with 18,000 times your engine efficiency (18000 x .37) we now have 6660 BTUs to do all the work, this is drive the car turn the alternator etc.
Now, if we use ALL that power to drive the alternator and our alternator that is 55% efficient our 6660 now becomes 3663 BTU. (6660 X .55) So to break EVEN that 3663 BTU must produce 18,000 BTU of hydrogen, and to increase your fuel mileage it MUST make more.
I know they told you the alternator is wasting electricity, it isn’t, when you don’t need as much electricity your alternator doesn’t put it out and thus doesn’t use as much power from the engine. But there is NO way for 3663 BTUs to make 18000 BTU if it could you would be making more power then you use.
Now agua-luna also says to use lye and aluminum and water to make hydrogen. I want you to think about this Lye and water is very a corrosive to aluminum, and yes it will make hydrogen, but as it bubbles up you not only get hydrogen, you also get an aerosol that contains lye and water so it will corrode aluminum heads and who knows what its going to do to the seals. So you might ruin your engine, and don't even think about breathing this stuff, it can kill you.
And think of the power it took to make the aluminum in the first place, you’d be better of energy wise to recycle the aluminum then using it for fuel.
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/ch…
It just a con to separate you from you money.
EDIT
Matthew B.
No my science isn’t wrong; I used BTU’s on purpose. Any fuel only has so much energy in it; most fuels are rated in BTUs. The numbers I used are readily available from many sources and if you wish I can post a link to them.
Gasoline has only so much potential heat to be used for work, 18,000 BTUs per pound, we already know how efficient an internal combustion engine is, 37% at best of all the energy consumed is used for work. We know how much is lost to friction 7% and the rest goes into the cooling system or the exhaust. By used only BTUs I could keep all the numbers in the same units.
So if only 37% of the heat is used for work, it doesn’t matter if I convert to kilowatts then HP first then back to BTUs or not. There is no need to estimate, I know how many BTUs at best are transferred, because we already know from research how much of each unit of energy is used.
“I don't know how much it needs but I believe it is ridiculous to assume that half the engine's output goes towards turning the powering the alternator.”
I didn’t say it took half the engine’s output to power and alternator, I said you lose half of the power you put into an alternator, a big difference. Even if an alternator was 90% efficient you are still losing power. Notice I didn’t even go into the energy need to crack water into hydrogen and oxygen. Now in order of this device to work, that is increase your fuel mileage, you have to make more BTU’s of fuel as you consume there isn’t a device out there that can do that.
If I didn’t care about other’s I wouldn’t take the time to post at all, and if you wish go ahead and try this device and any other device you wish, just know this device has been around since the 1970’s and it’s been tested many, many times, and it failed every time. So not only does the math not work out, if it did it would violate the laws of thermodynamics, but it’s been tested in the real world many times and it failed.
Also just one last thing your link take you to a web site that want to sell you a two books for only $97, and I noticed that in your post you said nothing to show where my math was wrong or my assumptions were wrong. Like I said I can point to tons of research you point to a web site that want to sell you something.
Report Abuse