Should the owner of the cubs sell naming rights to wrigley field witch means they would change the name of it?

Answer 1

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters

The should change the name of Wrigley to Loserville or Losers Field.

Source(s):

I'm back January 25th

Answer 2

No, the cubbies should stay just the way they are.

Answer 3

No! NO! NO! I hate this garbage seeing "comerica park and conseco field" and any sports arena named for a sponsor. If they pay for the entire stadium, then they should have the right to name it, but not at any other time. It damages the sports. I also hate "the GMAC bowl and the tortinos bowl and all the bowls that are now named for corporations. I am sick and tired of having advertisers in my face all the time. I watch sports to relax not have some idiot company in my face selling me something. The commercials are bad enough.

Answer 4

I hope they don't ....but no matter what it will always be Wrigley to me.


EDIT :
That's what she said.... The owners name was Wrigley....he just happened to own a candy factory as well. It's not called Wrigley's Double mint park now is it.

Answer 5

if a few million dollars in revenue is worth turning Wrigley field into Brittany Spears field, then sure, but they would be doing a disservice to the great tradition if they did.

Answer 6

NO!!! That is the greatest ballpark right now

Answer 7

no because wrigley field has been wrigley since 1914 and nobody likes the horrible names like comerica an us cellular they'r just dumb to try and change the second olldest park in the majors after fenway

Answer 8

You guys who say no are missing something really important - the field is already corporate sponsored!! They are named after the Wrigley chewing gum company! They were one of the first! People just seem to forget that Wrigley field is a corporate name already.