Muslims is the book of Isaiah corrupt when it says the Messiah will atone for sin?

Question

The Book of Isaiah was written 800 BC.
The DSS has the intact book of Isaiah dated 250 BC
In the Gospel of Luke Jesus teaches from the prophesies of Isaiah 53 Jesus claims this scripture is prophesy of him that he will fufill.
The Qu'ran in written in 600 AD Muhammad's book disagreesw iht the prophsies of Isiaiah
The book of Isiah we have today agrees wiht the scripture Jesus read in Luke, and the dead sea scrolls where Isaiah sas the Messiah will atone for sin.
If the book of Isaiah is corrupt now why is it the same as when Jesus refered to it?
Why is it the same as 250 years before the birth of Christ?
If this prophesy of Christ is not corrupt why is the Qu'ran teaching different than the prophets of God and Jesus?

Additional Details

Farid you do misinterpret scripture.
If we are to decide that the Jews are correct we must surely believe Jesus is not the Messiah and that Islam must surely be wrong.

Farid in regards to the prohesies of the virgin birth and the word alma...correct me sir if I am worng but the word refers to a young maiden...Now If a young maiden has a child is this a sign from God? Or is the young maiden a harlot?
If the word alma refers to a young woman is this a sign from God that a young woman bears a child?
I can't imagine this as a sign form God it seems to happen frequently daily are these all signs form God that young women bear children?

Sahar...I would reccomend you read Isaiah 53 and then read Luke 22:37 where Jesus cliams this is prophesy of him and says he must fufill this prophesy.

Sahar I have read Muhammad's book enough to know he could not be a prophet of God. He did not agree with God. He did not agree with the prophets of God nor did he agree with Jesus. His Allah is not the God of Abrham as he claims and does not agree wiht the God of Abrham nor does he follow the order of the God of Abraham he is not the righteous God of Abraham but does glory in deceit and the true God of Abrham and Jesus the Son of God do call Satan the liar and deceiver.
I encourage you to read the words of the true prophets of God and the wrod of Jesus Christ and the prophsies that demonstrate that Jesus is the Christ.

Farid why are you arguing against your own Qu'ran? The Qu'ran teaches Jesus was the Messiah born of a virgin. The problem being Isaiah teaches that the Messiah will atone for sin. Read Isaiah for yourself.

Answer 1

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker

I hope people can see this but more that likely there will be a few that say something has been changed even though we have hard evidence today.

Asker's Rating:

Asker's Comment:

God has made his truth available to all who care enough to seek him.

Answer 2

Well said.

Answer 3

DJmantex, if you have found such an amazing discovery then, tell me why dont all Jews believe in all this, Djmantex, it does not matter if the book of Isaiah is intact or not, but the important part is if its translation is intact, and how does atoning sin mean dying for people, that is in complete contradiction with the Bible,

Ezekiel 18:20
The soul who sins is the one who will die. The son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/ab…

so do you accept the contradiction between the crucifixion
and the Bible.
You see, there are many misinterpreted verses that are supposedly talking about Jesus(pbuh). for example

Isaiah 7:14 is talking about a virgin giving birth, but the real word is 'alma' meaning a 'young woman'.

another misinterpretation is Psalms 22:17:
"Like a lion, they are at my hands and feet." , but you see, the Hebrew word, Ki-ari which is interpreted as 'like a lion' actually means 'gouged'

Another misinterpretation is Isaiah chapter 53 which is talking about 'suffering servant' and Christians think it is talking about Jesus(pbuh), but you see, it is talking about the exile and the troubles of Jewish nation, because it follows chapter 52, and the reason it is in singular form is because Israel was referred to as one.

Thank you.

Source(s):

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/j…

Answer 4

Isaiah does not mentioned for any atonement for a sin which was not done or if done was already forgiven by God. Bible says Adam was Son of God and u say that all humanity became unpious because of their father Adam so Jesus atoned for that meaning ur God sacrificed himself for the sin of Adam. u unlucky person open eyes and read Quran once, u will know the difference between WORDS OF GOD and common gossips.

Source(s):

gen

Answer 5

Follow Christ.
It points to Him, it's all about HIM.