What would pro-abortion activists say if they realized magaret sanger was a racist eugenist?

Question

And no, margaret sanger wasn't a racist who merely happened to promote abortion by chance. She promoted it because she was a racist who wanted to eliminate undesirables like the poor. Abortion today is just a reverse psychology version of eugenics masquerading as "womens' rights" and "liberalism". Instead of saying that they want to eliminate the poor, abortion activists say that they are trying to solve poverty by reducing the birth rate of the poor. And instead of it being racist to support abortion, it's now "racist" not to support abortion. Of course you may also be able to reduce poverty simply by elimination of the population of poor people, but it's a pretty twisted way of doing it, because it's basically saying that some people's lives are not worth living compared to others.

Answer 1

Best Answer - Chosen by Asker

Why do you think they always have a black woman to head up Planned Parenthood? Yes, Margaret Sanger was very *much* a racist eugencist (as was Allan Guttmacher)! By hiding their *real* agenda, which was to eliminate poor people - *especially* *****/black/Afro-American ones - they started by fighting for the elimination of laws against contraception means and devices, then offering any birth control means they could acquire to poor people, especially poor black girls and women, at low or no cost! Planned Parenthood and NARAL, and their ilk, then launched their attack against poor girls' and women's babies already conceived - *especially* black ones.

Planned Parenthood finally managed to dupe a poor, divorced, woman to become Jane Roe in Roe vs Wade, and convinced enough liberal U. S. Supreme Court Justices to find a so-called "Right to Privacy" in the First Amendment of the Constitution (one which doesn't *really* exist)! Although any HS Sophomore Biology student knows when life *really* begins; liberal Justices didn't want to pursue the truth . . . just Planned Parenthood's agenda! Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey) actually had her child, did *not* have an abortion, and is now a pro-life activist! I personally had the pleasure of meeting this, now-Christian, lady a little over a decade ago!

While it is true that women/girls with lots of money could almost always get away with many crimes, including murder and abortion (while it was still illegal), Planned Parenthood has even managed to get taxpayer dollars from the U. S. Government to help fund their eugentics agenda and programs, all in the name of "helping" poor women (i.e., keeping the poor, especially black, population down)!

I'm sure that most pro-abortionists fully realize what they are doing - destroying human life - and really don't care, because they have the same racist eugentics agenda Margaret Sanger had! That's one reason they hate sonograms so much!

I have known many pro-abortionists, but they always want to be called "pro-choice" (as long as that choice doesn't include giving the girl/woman the choice of carrying the baby to term and either giving it up for adoption or taking responsibility for caring for and raising the child, herself, or by her relatives)!

Source(s):

Holy Bible, history books, studies of learned legal scholars about the Roe v Wade and Doe vs Bolton Supreme Court decisions

Asker's Rating:

Asker's Comment:

good

Answer 2

What is "pro-abortion"? Never met anyone who claimed to be "pro-abortion".

Answer 3

What would pro-death.. that's better (and more accurate).

Answer 4

Adolf Hitler would have been strongly against abortion. OK.


________________________
Sanger, like most of the population of her time, also considered masturbation dangerous:

"In my experience as a trained nurse while attending persons afflicted with various and often revolting diseases, no matter what their ailments, I have never found any one so repulsive as the chronic masturbator. It would be difficult not to fill page upon page of heartrending confessions made by young girls, whose lives were blighted by this pernicious habit, always begun so innocently, for even after they have ceased the habit, they find themselves incapable of any relief in the natural act. [...] Perhaps the greatest physical danger to the chronic masturbator is the inability to perform the sexual act naturally."
For her, masturbation was not just a physical act, it was a mental state:

"In the boy or girl past puberty, we find one of the most dangerous forms of masturbation, i.e., mental masturbation, which consists of forming mental pictures, or thinking obscene or voluptuous pictures. This form is considered especially harmful to the brain, for the habit becomes so fixed that it is almost impossible to free the thoughts from lustful pictures."

Sorry Bad Squirrel, Margeret Sanger was real and was as much of a religious fascist lunatic as the asker says.

Answer 5

Since there was/is no person named, "magaret sanger", I guess I wouldn't care.

Answer 6

You know I have never met anyone who was actively pro-abortion.

Think about it.

Answer 7

Shall we recite the history and crimes of the paragon of the pro-life movement, the Roman Church and its Popes?

Know from where the phrase, "Kill them all and let God sort them out." came?

"Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoset" or "Kill them all. God will know His own." The crusade against the Albigensians. The city of Beziers was taken, and since it could not be certainly ascertained who was and wasn't a heretic. some 100,000 were put to death. That was the 13th century. Shall we try the fourteenth and the massacre of native peoples in the Americas begun by Commander Columbus and the good Catholics he led? Or the the Duke of Alba in the Ntherlands. The witch trials. The centuries of Inquisition? Or perhaps the Hitler Youth leader that "sits on the throne of Peter" today.

I don't think you want to start those kinds of comparisons, being that your side has a 2000 year record of crimes against humanity and eugenics is less than a century old.

And not to rain on your litany of hysterical distortion with facts, but most abortions are not sought by poor minority women, but middle and upper class white women who can pay for them.

Answer 8

so you're against abortion?

Answer 9

Don't you know nothing matters as long as you are a Socialist /Liberal?Imus was a liberal but just not liberal enough with that big ol' Stetson on.

Answer 10

you..need to get a life!!!

Answer 11

Pro abortion? It's pro choice and it's a decision that should be made between the two people involved. There are thousands of unwanted children in foster care and even more that don't have foster homes. Can we please concentrate on the living rather than the unborn? You're so busy trying to save a bunch of cells that these living children get forgotten.

Answer 12

I don't know why you think it is racist to be pro-choice and I don't know why you think only poor people have abortions. I can't say you made much sense to me.

Answer 13

Lol - yeah because it's sooooooooooooooo much cheaper for a poor person to raise an unwanted child than pay the money for an abortion...And how do you explain abortions by women in higher social circles? Please don't hope to carry any water in that swiss cheese theory of yours...

Answer 14

the truth will let you know how other will call another a racist but you will be surpise who the real racist

Answer 15

A person's body is their own temple to worship as they see fit?

Answer 16

Not true at all. She wanted to offer all women the freedom to decide when they wanted to get pregnant and when they did not.

I am pro-choice and I will fight for it as long as I have breath. What any woman decides to do about her pregnancy is none of your business!

Answer 17

can't feed (or love) em, don't breed em should apply to all

Answer 18

I would say that she was a racist eugenicist--a woman of her time. Many people that have had an impact in our history may/do have a undecorated side to them. JFK was an adulterous playboy, Churchill was drunk, Lincoln is said to have hold racist opinions, but that doesn't change the positive that the may had in people's lives and in our history. Margaret Sanger helped women by promoting the use of birth control, thus empowering women to have more control over their sexuality.

Answer 19

no such thing as pro-abortion.

Women of all classes, races, creeds, and affiliations have abortions. do some groups do it more often or have more correlations (illusionary or otherwise) with it? yes

Answer 20

John, You have a very valid point about Margaret Sanger, although I would prefer to see a citation on a statement of this fact.

But consider what happens in the Latin American countries where both birth control and abortion are not acceptable. http://www.happychildhoods.org/
http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/peru…

Their birth rate is very high in Latin America. In fact, there are many more children out on the streets abandoned than orphanages available to take them in (source: Christian radio story). Can you be sure that every baby born will be adopted or cared for if we stop abortion?

It's very easy to consider that abortion saves babies, but the lack of abortion also results in 5, 7, 10, 12, 15, and 17 year olds who are born into bad homes where the cute baby is raised by someone who was not ready to give up an adorable baby.

I personally hate abortion, because I feel that it is used as a method of birth control. However, because I feel that there are problems our society is not ready to solve if we eliminate abortions, I feel that it would be a bigger mistake to once again make abortions illegal. We may allow them to live, but as you probably know, very few women who carry a baby to birth are emotionally willing to part with a cuddly baby. But those same moms are not prepared to care for a child.

Answer 21

Nothing. If you can't understand that abortion is murder, you can't comprend that murder either.

Source(s):

God