Why did make poverty history make so little progress in 2005?

Question

I'm most interested in replies where people share 2 beliefs I have:

1 Make Poverty History promised a heck of a lot and delivered very little in the poorest places and peoples like Africa's children where it was most needed. For example, by the end of the year Britain's Queen Elizabeth was asking whetehr humanity was turing on istelf?

2 The vast majority of people want to systemically change those unnecessary aspects of globalisation that discriminate ever more against these who allready have the least .

Optional further background
Mathematically I believe I can prove that there are 2 opposite types of economics - the big gets bigger with no responsibility for peoples who happen to get in the way: economics that gives everyone at least some connections to make a difference with. I don't want my daughter to grow up in a world ruled by big gets bigger, speculatiors gain and everyone else starting with the poorest loses. Any ideas? http://www.frappr.com/africamph

Additional Details

Breaking News : Blair has formed a Panel for Africa to inclue Bill Gates, Peter Eigen, Geldon, Kofi Annan, and the President of Nigeria

we'll be keeping track of this and other trends at http://www.frappr.com/africamph

Answer 1

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters

Im 16 and I confess even I dont know all about this.But its because of people ain't showing love.Look at 911 and Katrina,Thelma.....whatever-those left alot of people homeless.Does it have to be in our country?I dont know if your Black or White but these people(celebs)need to stop selling to the "White Man".Use that money to build a shelter my Moms is doing "Black Art" but still want to go to Africa and do that.So the 2 Kings died.....the world ain't hardly doing a damn thing.

Answer 2

The minorities.

Black, Hispanic mainly.