1. Home >
  2. Arts & Humanities >
  3. Philosophy >
  4. Resolved Question
Dr. Deepak Chopra Dr. Deepak Chopra
A Celebrity on Yahoo! Answers
Member since:
April 11, 2006
Total points:
173 (Level 1)
Badge Image:

Resolved Question

Show me another »

What do you think the role of individual transformation is in manifesting world peace?

Is peace consciousness of a critical mass of people the answer?
  • 4 years ago

Additional Details

This is truly Deepak Chopra. Check it out:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/y_answrs_team?…

4 years ago

Dear Friends,

I was absolutely overwhelmed by the response to my question.

Please see the blog entry for more of my thoughts:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/y_answrs_team?…

4 years ago

Rollstuhlwolf by Rollstuh...
Member since:
March 23, 2006
Total points:
3415 (Level 4)

Best Answer - Chosen by Voters

Transformation, or simply “change” is impossible for mankind to avoid. There is an evolution in this world, not only on a genetic level or cultural level, but of what I refer to as the “psychobiotic self”. Psycho referring to the psychology and symbolism which man uses to better cope with the overwhelming reality of his immergence and place and position in this world, and how it relates to his body, or “biotic” self and it’s eventual demise.

Man is constructed of two things. The first, and most simple is that of his body. A body which changes both because of the very biology and animalistic, inherent, traits that are programmed within it’s genome; but also changes because of necessity to delay the death process (IE, surgery, medicine, treatments, anything that extends the biology of the organism and idea of “health”) This is to further establish the second element of his being, the symbolic representation of man. To most of mankind, the biology and illusion of health is only a tool to which the man can master and control so that he has an extended period to develop the symbolic self. The symbolic self whom we try to immortalize after our biological entity has turned to worm meat or crematorium ash.

People go about doing this in different ways, this psychobiotic evolution as I put it. But each does so in a very individual way, which may or may not transform the world around him in yet another symbolic representation. And “peace” as you put it, is just another symbol or term that we use to represent a far greater idea. One that mankind has yet to agree upon as a worthwhile cause, in relation to the evolution of their psychobiotic self.

“Peace”, is really just a collective delaying of the end of the psychobiotic self. It is a theoretical state, in which all individuals accept and agree not to interfere with the evolution of all other individual attempts at mastery of the body, and the symbolic self. It is a group agreement to “Not inflict my own attempts at mastering my body and expanding my symbolic self, if you in turn do not thwart any of my efforts to achieve some sense of symbolic immortality before this biotic self of mine is returned to the earth. I will not interfere with your evolution, if you will not interfere with mine.”

I use the term “evolution”, as a synonym for change or metamorphosis. Any alteration or progression OR deterioration of both the body, and the symbol which man creates for himself. This is inclusive of “faith”, or the belief that your symbolic self will somehow transcend this observation or perception of reality. It will change, or evolve individually through understanding of the world around you, which again is unavoidable. Again, because of the biotic self and the finite nature of biology and how long our animal forms inhabit this existence. Our subtle realization of death, as proven by the likes of Otto Rank, Ernest Becker, and Norman O Brown among others, motivates us in ways which many are not entirely observant of, yet are there even without us consciously or truthfully admitting to or acknowledging clearly.

So the question to me is not the role of individual transformation in manifesting world peace; but can mankind agree upon what the symbol of peace represents and if so, how might this further or progress all mankind’s evolution of the psychobiotic self.

Will agreeing not to interfere with the development of individual attempts at making sense of cultural or personal symbolism, help man evolve or only divert it to another path of symbolic and biological consciousness? In other words, if everyone agrees to help delay the demise of our physical self or biotic self, how will this in itself change how man interprets his own existence and leaves symbols of his immortality?

If we are to remove the constant threat of physical destruction, will we have greater or less understanding of the symbols and psychology behind why we were so animate about destroying others symbols and biological form in the first place?

I suppose first we have to recognize and relate to what our own symbolic self is trying to represent currently. Which is where conflict is often initiated, both individually and world wide on the cultural, artistic, and religious stage. For example, if one were to say that “Deepak Chopra symbolizes the marriage between financial success and theological success”, some would wonder why I say this. Some would agree with me immediately, based on their own symbolic understanding of things. When one sees a man confidently smiling, wearing a pink (which some equate to homosexuality, others to confidence… i.e. the confidence of wearing a traditionally feminine color despite cultural taboo or beliefs) Ralph Lauren Polo shirt, with a golf club over one shoulder; they might think to themselves “Here is a man who has succeeded. He has money, which is represented by the logo on his shirt, known to be expensive. He has confidence, as one can interpret from body posture. But also, he has mastered his physical self. He is playing golf, a game known to be difficult because of the concentration of both mental and physical abilities.” One might think, or perhaps only myself “Here is a man aware of his psychobiotic evolution, and who seems to be mastering both his symbolism and biotic or physical self”.

Others interpretations of that image or symbol may differ based on culture, religion, exposure to your readings. Some just see a man. Some may see your race. Some may assume things based on your wardrobe. The interpretation of your symbol, varies on each individual’s understanding of symbols and what context or placement they have been given during the evolution of that person’s psychobiotic self.

Now with such a varying or “conflicting” interpretation of even one man, think how much larger and more widespread the interpretation of something as grand as “Peace” may be. Especially when you factor in the wide-spectrum understanding of symbolism that will differentiate from country to country, culture to culture, neighborhood to neighborhood, household to household, and person to person. With such a massive variation of understanding, and in many cases unwillingness to understand others, it will make it incredibly difficult to find a universal Symbol of any sort for individuals to agree upon.

Even my own interpretation of “Peace” may change, as I change throughout my own evolution. With constant change and metamorphosis and alteration of self , both symbolic and biological; to anchor oneself to any singular definition of things seems both alluring and impossible at the same time. Universal symbolism, cross cultural understanding, peace consciousness of a critical mass… these are overwhelming, and currently only hypothetical situations to which man is only touching upon in understanding. Both the ramifications of, and how they will directly change or evolve man himself in his individual evolution.

I believe, man must first deconstruct symbolism. We must be aware of what everything represents, before we can hope to ever gain any universal understanding of each other. Only if all symbols equal the same thing, can all of man truly see each other with some degree of truth and ultimate awakening or understanding of each other’s psychobiotic self. Then perhaps, with understanding of each other’s symbols, and the finite timeline we all have biologically to work on our own attempt at symbolizing something truthful and aware, we MIGHT be able to work on constructing a general definition of “Peace”.

And have reason both individually, and collectively, to maintain it for the sake of each other, and the greater definition of what that symbol of PEACE might represent.
  • 4 years ago
17% 22 Votes
Do I smell bologna?

Report Abuse

Thats it,back to word weaving school for me,and I have that song Dream Weaver stuck in my head... O_-

Report Abuse

Nice deep answer But please don't tell me this that its copied from a website

Report Abuse

Well, it's not copied from another site.

I believe that most people can agree on what peace is. Sheez...

Report Abuse

Congratulations. That is the most lucid response I have seen in Yahoo Answers so far.

Report Abuse

Rollstuhlwolf has managed to capture in a few short paragraphs, a laymans terms explanation for the worlds successes and ailments. Overall, The answer definately ranks among the few best answers ever, and the credit is well deserved. Well done, and enjoy awareness!

Report Abuse

What a colossal and pretentious load of tripe THAT answer was...

Report Abuse

Now, where is all this going on when I have to dodge crackheads in the streets, and suffer harrassment from other students earning their batchlors in psychology by picking at me so they can note my responses--they're protected, you know, by law to do things to people under guise of education.

Report Abuse

Continued comment--How much did Dr. Cheepak mete out or watch (done nothing)while he earned his degree? Going to a higher consciousness seems to give one the right to ignore wrongs on this plane.

Report Abuse

Impressive answer. Rollstuhlwolf's answer included free will
in its expression. Peace would be so easy to define if not for
free will; consider a rigid network of computers. Free will is the
belief of the right to freely change routine. Mutual peace must
be an evolving process due to free will.

Report Abuse

Other Answers (1 - 30 of 100)

  • AME by AME
    Member since:
    September 29, 2005
    Total points:
    1727 (Level 3)
    I think peace is entirely about the individual. Its only when people can be at peace with themselves that they'll understand how to really foster peace with others.
    • 4 years ago
    14% 18 Votes
  • Dr Hassan Hanif by Dr Hassan Hanif
    Member since:
    March 08, 2006
    Total points:
    939 (Level 2)
    individual role is very pivotol if we are not going to change our selves as our friend or neighbour will do good deeds...and if every onethinks the same than wht will be a situation of earth is well imagined
    • 4 years ago
    4% 5 Votes
  • flossintru by flossint...
    Member since:
    March 15, 2006
    Total points:
    13951 (Level 6)
    well i feel it's to gain inner peace yourself. If more people in the world had inner peace, there would be less hate, violence and intolerance. I do feel however, that inner peace is not easily found and therefore the solution to the problem is not an easy one.
    • 4 years ago
    8% 10 Votes
  • ecurb25 by ecurb25
    Member since:
    March 09, 2006
    Total points:
    7255 (Level 5)
    If true peace is to ever exist then each individual must be commit to that goal. Peace can be maintained through force for a limited time but that type of peace cannot last. Each individual must also be committed to the concept that no one should cause damage or loss to another individual.
    • 4 years ago
    2% 3 Votes
  • Mars Hall by Mars Hall
    Member since:
    April 11, 2006
    Total points:
    1859 (Level 3)
    I don't think it's really about individuals. The government will find an enemy for us no matter how at peace people are with themselves. Individuals don't create wars, governments do, and governments don't really want peace. There's money in war.
    • 4 years ago
    1% 1 Vote
  • peter s by peter s
    Member since:
    January 13, 2006
    Total points:
    12247 (Level 6)
    I think you have to work with what you have...we have the self. Peace starts with each of us...as we transition to more peacful individuals our little piece of the world transitions as well. We are examples to others and if we can be the peace we desire perhaps others will be inspired to make changes in their own lives.
    • 4 years ago
    2% 2 Votes
  • jezebelring by jezebelr...
    Member since:
    January 26, 2006
    Total points:
    4773 (Level 4)
    it is the first step--having personal peace consciousness and developing it within oneself. however, i don't think it's enough. too many people think that if they've got themselves together then their work is done--the next step is to share that process with the people you come into contact with so that they likewise can set themselves upon the path to peace.
    • 4 years ago
    2% 2 Votes
  • jimmyluger by jimmylug...
    Member since:
    April 10, 2006
    Total points:
    1050 (Level 3)
    like ghandi said, "be the change you want to see in the world"
    • 4 years ago
    2% 3 Votes
  • zarauberzang by zarauber...
    Member since:
    March 22, 2006
    Total points:
    1666 (Level 3)
    individuals do not and have not caused a significant transformation of nations or "the monster of civilzation"

    "A system is it's lack of integrity" F. N. - civilzation is a system and has proved itself - very few people declare war on others, nations/religions(systems)do - and people kill even when they really don't want to, or otherwise wouldn't for some distorted cause that in the end diminishes the true individual and their ability to have a transformative effect on a large scale. A system takes on a life of it's own beyond the individual.

    The world is a Monster of Energy . . . .

    Source(s):

    history, including yesterday ;)
    "the Crowd" french author ?
    • 4 years ago
    1% 1 Vote
  • absynthian by absynthi...
    Member since:
    January 12, 2006
    Total points:
    7123 (Level 5)
    Inividual transformation is the most essential part of attaining world peace. If the individuals are not at peace, even if peace were to be attained it coulsd not be maintained.
    • 4 years ago
    1% 1 Vote
  • phoneypersona by phoneype...
    Member since:
    March 28, 2006
    Total points:
    5430 (Level 5)
    Wars will go on till men refuse to fight.

    nuff said
    • 4 years ago
    1% 1 Vote
  • Lucious by Lucious
    Member since:
    April 11, 2006
    Total points:
    218 (Level 1)
    In deep down i feel like doing something against corruption. But i don't cos i m a sell fish. But what i do is, donate red cross and help individuals regularly. I want to help three person a day. but i don't do that regularly cos i m mean too.
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • hey by hey
    Member since:
    March 22, 2006
    Total points:
    5226 (Level 5)
    if each person across the planet would wake up each morning and say, 'i am not going to harm anything or anyone or myself today; i am going to smile and help someone feel better today-- every society would instantly be paradise.
    • 4 years ago
    2% 3 Votes
  • california1488 by californ...
    Member since:
    February 08, 2006
    Total points:
    489 (Level 2)
    Individual transformation is essential to world peace. But we can not change unless we know where we are wrong, how we are effecting eachother. If people keep offending and hurting eachother, the revenge and anger is cycle never ending. Accepting and owning our wrongs, admitting we are wrong and forgiving those that wronged us is the beginning of inner peace. From inner peace it can branch out to peace in our dewellings to peace between nations.
    • 4 years ago
    2% 2 Votes
  • hotangel by hotangel
    Member since:
    March 15, 2006
    Total points:
    732 (Level 2)
    yes i think so
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • biggestdog48 by biggestd...
    Member since:
    April 13, 2006
    Total points:
    135 (Level 1)
    As long as there are two humans on the earth there will never be true peace.
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • flsred by flsred
    Member since:
    April 07, 2006
    Total points:
    2405 (Level 3)
    Individual efforts aside. Until are society and others learn to accept differences and perhaps most importantly divorce religion from local, state, federal, and national politics we will never have peace on any of these levels.
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • who? by who?
    Member since:
    April 13, 2006
    Total points:
    110 (Level 1)
    we are all called to be salt and light if we are, then we at least offer that to the world everyone has a free will we can lead by example and offer influence and we are called to be peacefull and we can find inner peace through Jesus Christ happy Easter
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • flipper by flipper
    Member since:
    January 20, 2006
    Total points:
    6115 (Level 5)
    The role of individual transformation is the beginning point in manifesting world peace. Individuals must reach peace within themselves before there will be any type of global peace. We cannot love, accept or respect the differences of others without the ability to do these things within ourselves. We must learn to see people for who they are, rather than what they are. This is not maturity, but enlightenment.

    Peace consciousness is a contagion. Just like a virus, a mind-set shared by some will, in time, become shared by many. Keep it going long enough and it will become an antibody against prejudice which, in the beginning, middle and end is the primary cause of the chaos in our present day world. 'Pay it forward'

    I hope you like my answer as much as I like your question. Thank you
    Robin


    Edit: Had to correct a word
    • 4 years ago
    4% 5 Votes
  • frodo by frodo
    Member since:
    January 27, 2006
    Total points:
    20032 (Level 6)
    One man stood in front of a line of tanks...and captured the imagination of the world.
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • mallicoatdd by mallicoa...
    Member since:
    February 02, 2006
    Total points:
    2424 (Level 3)
    I feel it is of the utmost importance and the essential ingredient. For if there is no individual transformation then there can be no transformation at all. If transformation of the state of our world is to take place then it must start with the individual. In order to truly accomplish this I have to become totally aware of my effect on the world around me. Whether it be effects on the Quantum World as discussed on "What the Bleep do We Know" and by the work of Dr. Emoto or the physical, emotional, and energetic effect we have on people around us. Those at the Impact Trainings said it best for me when they stated "If it is to be it is up to me" the ultimate reference to personal transformation indicating that everyone must take a stand for their own space and contribution as they cannot count on any one else to do it. For if my neighbor is being a positive contribution to the world and I am not then true world change cannot take place and his effort lessened by my lack of effort. True WORLD peace involves us all and can only be accompished when we ALL come together individually to bring about change

    So stop and take a look at how you affect the world around you through your thoughts, actions, perspectives, expectations, judgements and attitudes and if you truly would like something different then make it happen in your self for that is the place that it MUST start

    Source(s):

    www.whatthebleep.com
    www.impacttainings.com
    www.masaru-emoto.net
    • 4 years ago
    1% 1 Vote
  • Sacramento dweller by Sacramento dweller
    Member since:
    February 27, 2006
    Total points:
    1498 (Level 3)
    Change yourself and you will change the world.
    • 4 years ago
    2% 2 Votes
  • momsapplepeye by momsappl...
    Member since:
    February 15, 2006
    Total points:
    11703 (Level 6)
    These are very interesting terms you are weaving Sir. The way you describe things, well amazing,very transcendental of you. The only thing that will manifest world peace is the heart felt prayers of a people crying out to their God. Then we can all reach that critical mass together. A love-in alone without God is loveless,meaningless, and contributes to the upheavals of the world. Selfishness,hopelessness,hate are the enemy... Nothing the brain can control will be affective,for without the spirit / soul from within, we are mere flesh and blood on a time limit. Sound flowery too :) May the Lord richly bless you Dr. Deepak Chopra, meet you where you are Peace!

    Source(s):

    "Love is an action,not a reaction"
    "We are all ImperfectVessels,we all stand naked under our clothes. We begin the same end the same. BIRTH, then DEATH. It is what you do with the Middle that counts,LOVE one another, as You Yourself Wish to be LOVED. We are all in the Circle of life Together, let us live like it! ImPerfect VeSsels™ ©~"
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • buckram2003 by buckram2...
    Member since:
    April 11, 2006
    Total points:
    123 (Level 1)
    world peace?..firstly..the lack of peace is caused by the complete destruction of the human psyche,which began when humans searching for a so called GOD. FOUND RELIGION..all religions are false..its strange but do you notice how violent zealots of these religions are when threatened with exposure?..science has completely prooven that the bible is only a compiliation of stories..mary was raped by god while engaged to joseph..jesus,s life was an exemplary one yes..but his teachings has done far more harm than good.eg.ireland,iraq.palestine,THE crusades,and present day america..religion is a crime..we as humans are spiritual beings.our physical selves are our homes.the spirit is intangible,invisible and imortal..until we see ourselves as we really are and not seek a god,(god is dog reversed) we will not find peace.the transformation necessary for world peace has to begin with the replacement of religion as the basis for all we are as humans..this dysfunctional existence is manifested daily on our newscasts.or rather in our media..our politicians have embraced theese falsehoods thereby almost legitimizing them..but most see the desease in the world and no answers in sight..they kill the messengers and brand them as radicals..john lennons IMAGINE..is a great place to start..dr deepak..i admire your work...thanks

    Source(s):

    JOHN LENNONS..IMAGINE, MY FREE MIND.
    • 4 years ago
    1% 1 Vote
  • Anø1eus© by Anø1eus©
    Member since:
    December 22, 2005
    Total points:
    20141 (Level 6)
    we must learn to accept all tolerance..when a person has done damage-(that is irreversable)-he must make peace with others, and those who he hurt should also make peace. no matter if the "bad seed" makes more trouble-(within tolerant levels)..being shunned and rejected is a terrible thing..
    we shouldnt go to war against each other..we should shake hands and try hard to get along here..neutrality, civility and most of all-compassion is the key word in preventing any more conflicts
    ------------------------------
    iam honored and humbled by
    your presense Dr. Chopra. thank you for visiting us!

    Source(s):

    own personal experience
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • RuneAmok by RuneAmok
    Member since:
    March 13, 2006
    Total points:
    74801 (Level 7)
    World peace is an impossibility. It's nothing more than a platform for Miss America.

    Sure, it would be great if everyone took the time to learn to become more peaceful. But as imperfect beings, there's no way we could be peaceful all the time.

    All it would take is someone having one bad moment and wham! the domino effect would kick in and no more world peace.

    Which is not to say it wouldn't be great if, at the very least, EVERYONE practiced minding their own business and being polite. But that's a pipedream as well.

    Source(s):

    Observation
    • 4 years ago
    2% 2 Votes
  • Someone by Someone
    Member since:
    January 01, 2006
    Total points:
    1319 (Level 3)
    all that needs to happen is for every individual to decide that she or he is going to be more respectful to everything and everyone (not just humans) and actually do it. no one person needs to convince thousands of ppl, the choice to be a better person should come from within urself. if other someone told other ppl that they needed to act better, the ppl would call them hypocrites or something equally obnoxious. it's really simple in theory, but in real life it doesn't work that way.
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • 12879 by 12879
    Member since:
    April 10, 2006
    Total points:
    359 (Level 2)
    When I read posts on this site, I see so much negativity, intolerance, hate, judgment, insecurity, etc. People who feel this way have lost connection to their humanity, and their ability to feel compassion for people who are not like them. If they could find this connection again, it would affect more than just themselves - it would affect everything and everyone in their lives. I think power lies more in the individual than most people realize.
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • SunDancer by SunDance...
    Member since:
    March 16, 2006
    Total points:
    10946 (Level 6)
    Promote Peace, and abandon racism, mind our own business if not helping others, and just follow the 10 commandments. And YES to your final question ;)
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes
  • ? by ?
    Member since:
    March 13, 2006
    Total points:
    1055 (Level 3)
    Is it a numbers game? Nature suggests that where there are higher aggregates of the same cause there is victory. One person, however, can incorporate as many parts of the whole as is wished. Jesus, Martin Luther King, Napoleon, even Hitler all used this power of suggestion at the right (or wrong) time to galvanize the masses. I think it is a matter of timing, luck, and yes, the individual need to change. Once we individually see that we are hurting ourselves, we stop the blood. Then, if and when, we see the same problem we have experienced in others we can better help and assist. Individual transformation is a must in order to properly objectify the world we live in to make better judgments and align ourselves better with our higher selves' intention.
    So, yes, I believe the more minds and hearts in tune with love and compassion, the more chance we all have at successfully acheiving that vision. If we all are thinking and feeling love and lovingness, there is no space or room then for hating, negating, or otherwise, berating.
    Peace in the hearts of men is not far off, I think.
    Love is the key. Desire for change and abundance is the propellant.

    Source(s):

    I want to thank you for all of your fine work. I work in the spiritual field and had an opportunity to see you once at the UW bookstore in Seattle. Of course, I am one of so many who appreciate all that you do to help guide a course of discovery and appreciation of the self. God continue to bless you, Deepak.
    • 4 years ago
    0% 0 Votes

Answers International

Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any Yahoo! Answers content. Click here for the Full Disclaimer.

Help us improve Yahoo! Answers. Send Feedback